AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

Graph embedding and spectral sparsification

Scale graph embeddings via coarsening and spectral sparsification.

126 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Graph algorithms and clustering, keyword cluster “search · directed · causal”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 21 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 13.3% to 10.4%.

No longer reported by papers here: PROTEINS (accuracy, last in 2024); ENZYMES (accuracy, last in 2023); Cora (accuracy (%), last in 2023); MUTAG (accuracy, last in 2024); Citeseer (accuracy (%), last in 2023); Pubmed (accuracy (%), last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 7162017: 8172018: 7182019: 11192020: 12202021: 19212022: 15222023: 14232024: 12242025: 13252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

PROTEINS · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2016–2024 · not reported since 2024

2016: 76.42021: 76.5
20162024
YearBest so farSet by
201676.4On Valid Optimal Assignment Kernels and Applications to Graph Classification (NeurIPS 2016 · 120 citations)
202176.5Wasserstein Embedding for Graph Learning (ICLR 2021 · 4 citations)

ENZYMES · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2016–2023 · not reported since 2023

2016: 61.812021: 77
20162023
YearBest so farSet by
201661.81The Multiscale Laplacian Graph Kernel (NeurIPS 2016 · 111 citations)
202177Isolation Graph Kernel (AAAI 2021 · 7 citations)

Cora · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

6 papers, 2016–2023 · not reported since 2023

2016: 91.91
20162023
YearBest so farSet by
201691.91Group and Graph Joint Sparsity for Linked Data Classification (AAAI 2016 · 4 citations)

MUTAG · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2016–2024 · not reported since 2024

2016: 87.94
20162024
YearBest so farSet by
201687.94The Multiscale Laplacian Graph Kernel (NeurIPS 2016 · 111 citations)

Citeseer · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 71.12021: 72.72022: 73
20202023

Pubmed · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 77.82021: 79.6
20202023
YearBest so farSet by
202077.8GraphZoom: A Multi-level Spectral Approach for Accurate and Scalable Graph Embedding (ICLR 2020 · 14 citations)
202179.6Structure-Aware Random Fourier Kernel for Graphs (NeurIPS 2021 · 3 citations)

What has been tried

110 papers here report 1,012 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 17%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use 2 graph layers instead of 1COCO retrieval · Text retrieval R@175.1 -> 76.2HelpedGeoMM: On Geodesic Perspective for Multi-modal Learning (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
add edges connecting consecutive graphcode layersPoint cloud shape dataset · accuracy82.8±1.9 -> 86.9±1.4HelpedGraphcode: Learning from multiparameter persistent homology using graph neural networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Set S = sD rather than S = sIMNIST, 1 label/class · accuracy97.4 (0.1) -> 97.5 (0.1)No clear effectContinuous Partitioning for Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
remove the covariance regularizer (β=0)graph visualization · visualization qualityHurtWatE: A Wasserstein t-distributed Embedding Method for Information-enriched Graph Visualization (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove the geometry lossExperiments reported in the paper · experimental resultsNo clear effectCover learning for large-scale topology representation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add hinge loss to L2Cora · exact embedding dimension (D*)6 -> 7HurtHow Low Can You Go? Searching for the Intrinsic Dimensionality of Complex Networks using Metric Node Embeddings (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add the metric-distortion validation step after ORC candidate selectionSynthetic manifolds: 1D and 2D pruning benchmarks · good-edge removal (%)ORC-ManL: 0.0±0.0; ORC Only: 10.9±0.1 to 18.1±0.3HelpedRecovering Manifold Structure Using Ollivier Ricci Curvature (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
double the number of communitiesCora and CiteSeer · accuracyCora: 0.49 ± 0.09 -> 0.56 ± 0.09; CiteSeer: 0.56 ± 0.06 -> 0.56 ± 0.05HelpedA Poincaré Inequality and Consistency Results for Signal Sampling on Large Graphs (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Add the optimal weighted self-loopSemi-supervised CSBM · exact recovery probabilityI(a_\tau,b_\tau, 0 )>1; I(a_\tau,b_\tau,c_\tau)>1HelpedOptimal Exact Recovery in Semi-Supervised Learning: A Study of Spectral Methods and Graph Convolutional Networks (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Use the minimal hierarchy-aware negative edge set E_H* instead of the full edge complementMeSH 2020 · F1HelpedLearning Representations for Hierarchies with Minimal Support (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
replace vanilla attention with curvature-aware attentionWrinkle manifold, p-Laplacian diffusion · L2 relative error (%)8.47±2.82 -> 3.41±0.59HelpedCurvature-aware Graph Attention for PDEs on Manifolds (ICML 2025)
Vary the mixup graph size rgraph classification datasets · accuracy±3%No clear effectGraph Mixup on Approximate Gromov–Wasserstein Geodesics (ICML 2024)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
WLNCI1accuracy81.4 – 85.83 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2018 and NeurIPS 2016
WLProteinsaccuracy71.4 – 75.62 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2018 and NeurIPS 2016

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • AIDS · 2 of 14 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 14 papers

Baselines

  • UMAP · 3 of 14 papers
  • Isomap · 2 of 14 papers
  • LLE · 2 of 14 papers
  • t-SNE · 2 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 47 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy