AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Privacy attacks and secure learning

Gradient inversion attacks

Reconstruct training data from shared gradients and defend against such leakage.

47 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Privacy attacks and secure learning, keyword cluster “attack · defense · backdoor”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

19 papers in 2023–24 and 12 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 14.5% to 8.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 7212022: 8222023: 6232024: 13242025: 5252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

39 papers here report 421 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 57%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 27%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add image prior Rimage to gradient matching onlyImageNet, batch size 8 · LPIPS0.80 -> 0.57HelpedHigh-Fidelity Gradient Inversion in Distributed Learning (AAAI 2024 · 16 citations)
increase λg from 0.5 to 1.0TinyImageNet, Imprint attack · SSIM0.80 -> 0.78HelpedConcealing Sensitive Samples against Gradient Leakage in Federated Learning (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
increase k1+k2 from 48% to 80%CIFAR10, Rob attack · LPIPS0.426 -> 0.527HelpedRevisiting Gradient Pruning: A Dual Realization for Defending against Gradient Attacks (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Apply rank-threshold heuristic when gradients are full rankCoLA, B=128 · ROUGE-10 -> 30.3HelpedDAGER: Exact Gradient Inversion for Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations)
Increase Inverting Gradients batch size from 4 to 16CIFAR-10 test · accuracy90.34% -> 76.83%HurtLeak and Learn: An Attacker's Cookbook to Train Using Leaked Data from Federated Learning (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
Increase batch sizeCIFAR-100 · patch recovery rateHurtGradient Inversion Attacks on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (CVPR 2025 · 6 citations)
Add the M-Adaptive ProcessMNIST, ε=10 · PSNR_i32.98 -> 33.09HelpedMjölnir: Breaking the Shield of Perturbation-Protected Gradients via Adaptive Diffusion (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Add the second stage of the greedy reconstruction algorithmImage reconstruction across batch sizes · accuracyHelpedSPEAR: Exact Gradient Inversion of Batches in Federated Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Train critical parameters rather than all parametersCIFAR10, non-IID, FedAvg · MSE0.0069 -> 0.0123HurtDataStealing: Steal Data from Diffusion Models in Federated Learning with Multiple Trojans (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Vary the STRIKE attack-strength parameter νImageNet-12 · accuracyMixedExploit Gradient Skewness to Circumvent Byzantine Defenses for Federated Learning (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Reduce the auxiliary dataset to 5 samples per classSVHN and Tiny-ImageNet · iAccNo clear effectRecovering Labels from Local Updates in Federated Learning (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use histogram statistics rather than KMeans cluster centers or a fitted Gaussian to characterize conformity-score distributionsFederated conformal prediction Byzantine setting · performanceHelpedCertifiably Byzantine-Robust Federated Conformal Prediction (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 4 of 7 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 3 of 7 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 7 papers
  • CINIC-10 · 2 of 7 papers
  • TinyImageNet · 2 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • DLG · 3 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 31 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy