AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

Vertical federated learning

Train across parties holding different features with privacy and communication efficiency.

38 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Personalized and heterogeneous FL, keyword cluster “domain · label · multi”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 10 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.2% to 2.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 2212022: 7222023: 9232024: 9242025: 8252026: 226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

31 papers here report 305 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 19%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add p2a distillation lossCriteo · AUC (L-Util, %)72.1 -> 72.5HelpedComplementary Knowledge Distillation for Robust and Privacy-Preserving Model Serving in Vertical Federated Learning (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
replace direct FedAvg aggregation with server-level CMA-ES aggregationlanguage understanding datasets · accuracyHelpedFedBPT: Efficient Federated Black-box Prompt Tuning for Large Language Models (ICML 2024 · 7 citations)
add dynamic maskingMNIST (50 parties) · accuracy72.89% ± 1.43% -> 85.47% ± 0.13%HelpedFederated Transformer: Multi-Party Vertical Federated Learning on Practical Fuzzily Linked Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
increase the number of hash functionsSU · test accuracyHelpedHaCore: Efficient Coreset Construction with Locality Sensitive Hashing for Vertical Federated Learning (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Add GCE to FedGVI with α-Rényi divergenceMNIST, 10% contamination, 10 clients · accuracy96.36± 0.09 -> 97.50± 0.07HelpedFederated Generalised Variational Inference: A Robust Probabilistic Federated Learning Framework (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use Gumbel-Softmax BDPL instead of BDPLGLUE Avg. (GPT-3.5 Turbo) · score61.67 -> 64.28HelpedFedOne: Query-Efficient Federated Learning for Black-box Discrete Prompt Learning (ICML 2025)
Add the waiting deadline mechanismSynthetic · AUC92.86 -> 94.17HelpedPubSub-VFL: Towards Efficient Two-Party Split Learning in Heterogeneous Environments via Publisher/Subscriber Architecture (NeurIPS 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Covertype · 2 of 8 papers
  • YearPredictionMSD · 2 of 8 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 28 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 33 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy