AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

Federated semi-supervised and graph learning

Learn from unlabeled or graph data across clients with pseudo-labeling.

84 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Personalized and heterogeneous FL, keyword cluster “domain · label · multi”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 54 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 8.0% to 13.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 1212022: 8222023: 5232024: 15242025: 25252026: 2926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

52 papers here report 547 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 77%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 15%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add FCPPTwitch α=10 (AVG) · accuracy50.04 -> 61.74HelpedFederated Graph Learning under Domain Shift with Generalizable Prototypes (AAAI 2024 · 46 citations)
use federated filtering instead of current-round-only filter aggregationCIFAR-10 non-IID, p=0.3, αDir=10, ρ=0.6, τ=0.5 · test accuracy83.22±2.61 -> 85.31±2.28HelpedFedDiv: Collaborative Noise Filtering for Federated Learning with Noisy Labels (AAAI 2024 · 38 citations)
add the Distance RegularizerCIFAR-10 IID ρ=0.5, τ=0.3 · accuracy84.45 -> 87.06HelpedFedFixer: Mitigating Heterogeneous Label Noise in Federated Learning (AAAI 2024 · 30 citations)
Increase the number of cluster centroids from L=3 to L=10OpenImage client0 · accuracy56.33 -> 57.16HelpedExploring One-Shot Semi-supervised Federated Learning with Pre-trained Diffusion Models (AAAI 2024 · 28 citations)
use clustering before concatenating client encoders instead of concatenating all client modelsCIFAR-10 · test accuracyHelpedExploiting Label Skews in Federated Learning with Model Concatenation (AAAI 2024 · 27 citations)
Add vacant-class distillation and logit suppression to the FedLC objectiveCIFAR10, Dirichlet β=0.05 · accuracy57.31 -> 75.71 (+18.40)HelpedExploring Vacant Classes in Label-Skewed Federated Learning (AAAI 2025 · 21 citations)
Add C-reg to the variant without C-regCIFAR-10 (DIR, DIR) · accuracy54.79 -> 57.73HelpedCombating Data Imbalances in Federated Semi-supervised Learning with Dual Regulators (AAAI 2024 · 17 citations)
Add local GMM contrastive learning to FedAvg + GCDCUB-200 and Oxford-Pet EH · All accuracy43.3 -> 52.2; 72.1 -> 79.5HelpedFederated Generalized Category Discovery (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
add FURCIFAR10 cross-silo, α = 0.1 · KNN accuracy (%)80.93 -> 81.39HelpedRethinking the Representation in Federated Unsupervised Learning with Non-IID Data (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
Add consensus prototype optimizing (CPO) to the baseline client modelAll datasets shown in Figure 3 · Clustering performanceHelpedFederated Graph-Level Clustering Network (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)
Add the weighted aggregation strategyChild, Insurance, Alarm, Pigs, and Gene · F1 scoreHelpedFedCSL: A Scalable and Accurate Approach to Federated Causal Structure Learning (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Add candidate label disambiguationCIFAR-10, SVHN, CIFAR-100 · accuracy53.86% -> 90.35%; 73.77% -> 95.81%; 26.62% -> 68.53%HelpedFederated Partial Label Learning with Local-Adaptive Augmentation and Regularization (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 7 of 27 papers
  • Cora · 7 of 27 papers
  • PubMed · 6 of 27 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 5 of 27 papers
  • CiteSeer · 5 of 27 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 4 of 27 papers
  • Amazon Photo · 4 of 27 papers
  • MNIST · 3 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • FedAvg · 11 of 27 papers
  • FedProx · 7 of 27 papers
  • FedSage+ · 7 of 27 papers
  • FedPub · 7 of 27 papers
  • FedStar · 5 of 27 papers
  • FedGTA · 4 of 27 papers
  • GCFL · 3 of 27 papers
  • FedNova · 3 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 74 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 30 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy