AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

Federated prompt and LoRA tuning

Adapt foundation models federatedly with prompts and low-rank adapters.

91 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Personalized and heterogeneous FL, keyword cluster “domain · label · multi”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 69 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.8% to 17.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 2212022: 2222023: 2232024: 15242025: 24252026: 4526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

40 papers here report 424 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 17%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Integrate FlexLoRA with FedIT at homogeneous rank 8Test loss convergence, homogeneous rank 8 · test lossNo clear effectFederated Fine-tuning of Large Language Models under Heterogeneous Tasks and Client Resources (NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations)
Replace unbalanced OT with similarity averagingFood101, DTD, Caltech101, Flowers102, OxfordPets (2 shots) · accuracy89.12±0.28 -> 83.38±0.54; 85.50±0.35 -> 81.01±0.23; 95.05±0.49 -> 92.68±0.44; 93.96±0.48 -> 91.73±0.68; 97.73±0.57 -> 96HurtGlobal and Local Prompts Cooperation via Optimal Transport for Federated Learning (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
Vary the scaling factor among 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2Dolly and Wizard; TinyLlama and Llama · accuracyMixedFLoRA: Federated Fine-Tuning Large Language Models with Heterogeneous Low-Rank Adaptations (NeurIPS 2024 · 36 citations)
Use adaptive per-sample key selection instead of the meta prompt aloneDomainNet supervised, domain differences · accuracy (average)60.39 -> 67.39HelpedFederated Adaptive Prompt Tuning for Multi-Domain Collaborative Learning (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
Add traceable task learning (TTL)CIFAR-100, task scale 2 · accuracy69.20% -> 71.40%HelpedTraceable Federated Continual Learning (CVPR 2024 · 19 citations)
Add server and client permutation-and-integration (PIA)Task 1 VQA · accuracy (overall)43.04 -> 46.66HelpedFedPIA – Permuting and Integrating Adapters Leveraging Wasserstein Barycenters for Finetuning Foundation Models in Multi-Modal Federated Learning (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
Use LR scaling with α = 2 instead of the α = 8 baselineQNLI · accuracy (%)91.36\% -> 71.88\%HurtImproving LoRA in Privacy-preserving Federated Learning (ICLR 2024 · 6 citations)
Inject artificial noise into learned population statisticsCIFAR-10, large batch size · test loss0.41 -> 0.32HelpedPopulation Normalization for Federated Learning (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Initialize experts from the common expert instead of from scratchCIFAR100 after 2000 rounds · zero-shot accuracy83.27%HelpedLearning to Specialize: Joint Gating-Expert Training for Adaptive MoEs in Decentralized Settings (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Vary the global-local mixing coefficient θ across its range rather than use either endpoint aloneCIFAR-100, varying data heterogeneity and client number · accuracyHelpedFederated Learning from Vision-Language Foundation Models: Theoretical Analysis and Method (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use CoPreFL rather than CoPreFL-SGD; apply meta-updates to server dataCIFAR-100, scenario II, non-IID · accuracy83.63 ± 3.00 -> 86.63 ± 2.93HelpedRethinking the Starting Point: Collaborative Pre-Training for Federated Downstream Tasks (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Use the AFM adapter instead of MLP or MoE in FORLAMixed-domain Average · mBO41.53; 42.29; 43.81HelpedFORLA: Federated Object-centric Representation Learning with Slot Attention (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 38 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-100 · 10 of 38 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 7 of 38 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 6 of 38 papers
  • DTD · 6 of 38 papers
  • Caltech101 · 6 of 38 papers
  • Food101 · 5 of 38 papers
  • Flowers102 · 5 of 38 papers
  • OxfordPets · 5 of 38 papers

Baselines

  • PromptFL · 7 of 38 papers
  • FedOTP · 5 of 38 papers
  • LoRA · 4 of 38 papers
  • FedProx · 4 of 38 papers
  • FedIT · 4 of 38 papers
  • FFA-LoRA · 4 of 38 papers
  • FedAvg · 3 of 38 papers
  • Scaffold · 3 of 38 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 86 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 26 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy