AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Private online and user-level learning

Analyze private learning in online, shuffle and user-level settings.

116 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Differential privacy, keyword cluster “estimation · error · algorithms”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

33 papers in 2023–24 and 30 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 15.3% to 11.3%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 2172018: 4182019: 8192020: 11202021: 14212022: 10222023: 17232024: 16242025: 15252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

89 papers here report 546 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 60%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 25%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase from 1 to 8 elements per coordinateDP-SGD, 1000 dimensions, 100 steps · mean bound on ε0.49 (± 0.01) -> 0.62 (± 0.01)HelpedHow Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run? (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use k=1 histogram bin instead of a larger bin countLaw School · KS distance (ΔSP)HelpedDifferentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use disjoint batches for local-vector updates and embedding gradients instead of reusing the same batchesLinear regression · gradient norm boundHelpedPrivate Model Personalization Revisited (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the interpolation parameter ρ from the bag-level loss toward the instance-level lossLinear regression, proportional regime · biasHurtLearning from Aggregate responses: Instance Level versus Bag Level Loss Functions (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Replace Gaussian-process perturbations and averaging with regularization for convex classesSemi-private learning, convex function classes · private labeled sample complexity dependence on accuracyO\left( \mathsf{vc}(\cF) \cdot \varepsilon^{-3} \cdot \alpha^{-14} \right) -> (\sup_m \overline{\cG}_m(\cF))^2 \cdot \vaHelpedOracle-Efficient Differentially Private Learning with Public Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
vary the truncation constant cSetting 2 dataset · coverageMixedOnline Differentially Private Conformal Prediction for Uncertainty Quantification (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 23 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 3 of 23 papers

Baselines

  • DPO · 2 of 23 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 63 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy