AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Differential privacy

Private training with public data

Reduce accuracy loss of differentially private models with public data, finetuning and new mechanisms.

96 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Differential privacy, keyword cluster “dp sgd · gradient · clipping”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

40 papers in 2023–24 and 34 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 18.6% to 12.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 0182019: 3192020: 4202021: 8212022: 6222023: 18232024: 22242025: 15252026: 1926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

72 papers here report 633 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 22%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
replace DDPM synthesis with EDM synthesisCIFAR-10 · test accuracy72.0% -> 75.13 %HelpedIn-distribution Public Data Synthesis with Diffusion Models for Differentially Private Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 5 citations)
Freeze all weights while retaining forward hooksQQP · training time per epoch119 minutes -> 80 minutesHelpedDifferentially Private Bias-Term Fine-tuning of Foundation Models (ICML 2024 · 5 citations)
increase synthetic initialization training by adding Shaders21K initializationImageNet-1K linear probing · accuracymore than 24%HelpedDifferentially Private Representation Learning via Image Captioning (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Use noiseless rather than noisy training simulation to select the biased dimensionHousing · privacy auditing lower boundHelpedTighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat Model (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Use shared rather than unshared embedding parametersMovieLens, ε=5 · NDCG@10HelpedDelving into Differentially Private Transformer (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
allow duplicate examples in greedy contribution boundingarXiv test set · lossHelpedIt's My Data Too: Private ML for Datasets with Multi-User Training Examples (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add learning-rate decay to PMSVM-GPUCI datasets · accuracyMixedMulti-Class Support Vector Machine with Differential Privacy (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the capped node degree KText-attributed graph relation prediction · utilityHelpedDifferentially Private Relational Learning with Entity-level Privacy Guarantees (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Update the learning rate every iteration rather than less frequentlyCIFAR100, ViT-Base · training time (minutes)152.617 (\times 1.370) -> 118.483 (\times 1.063) -> 113.317 (\times 1.017)HurtTowards hyperparameter-free optimization with differential privacy (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Set ν to 0, removing exponential damping from the correlationsCIFAR-10 and StackOverflow · accuracyHurtCorrelated Noise Provably Beats Independent Noise for Differentially Private Learning (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Project perturbed training and test features onto the top 10 PCA componentsCIFAR-10 · accuracyHelpedNeural Collapse meets Differential Privacy: Curious behaviors of NoisyGD with Near-Perfect Representation Learning (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Evaluate the maximum rather than the mean across secretsExperiments across datasets and models · Qualitative persistence of key resultsNo clear effectEmpirical Privacy Variance (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 7 of 17 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 17 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 2 of 17 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 74 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy