AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Industrial anomaly detection

Detect anomalies with student-teacher, multi-sensor, and likelihood-based methods.

117 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Open-set and few-shot detection, keyword cluster “images · anomaly · interactive”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

34 papers in 2023–24 and 51 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 5.8% to 9.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 1172018: 4182019: 5192020: 5202021: 7212022: 8222023: 17232024: 17242025: 27252026: 2426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

85 papers here report 898 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 20%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add noisy anomalous training samples at α = 0.1 instead of α = 0.0Real-IAD · S-AUROC94.4 -> 92.2HurtReal-IAD: A Real-World Multi-View Dataset for Benchmarking Versatile Industrial Anomaly Detection (CVPR 2024 · 127 citations)
Add pixel-wise product aggregation of the 2D and 3D anomaly mapsMVTec 3D-AD · AUPRO@1%0.430 -> 0.455HelpedMultimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection by Crossmodal Feature Mapping (CVPR 2024 · 85 citations)
Remove masked blending boundary learning (L1)CDF-v2 · AUC0.900 -> 0.899No clear effectForensics Adapter: Adapting CLIP for Generalizable Face Forgery Detection (CVPR 2025 · 46 citations)
Use Deepfake and Camera category prompts instead of Trump and BidenUniversalFakeDetect · mAcc93.00 -> 93.79HelpedC2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detection (AAAI 2025 · 43 citations)
Apply GFPGAN super-resolution to SRISRI · AUC0.772 -> 0.983HelpedDF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detection (NeurIPS 2024 · 42 citations)
Use proposed features and BRF with one segmentVAD high-shot supervised benchmark · Cl. AUROC87.3 -> 88.6HelpedSupervised Anomaly Detection for Complex Industrial Images (CVPR 2024 · 39 citations)
Add entropy loss (L_H) to supervised lossesMVTec LOCO AD, Average (LA) · AUROC95.9 -> 96.3HelpedFew Shot Part Segmentation Reveals Compositional Logic for Industrial Anomaly Detection (AAAI 2024 · 37 citations)
Replace region-to-region contrastive pretraining with SAM pretrainingBinary IFL test datasets · F1 fixed62.6 -> 48.6HurtSAFIRE: Segment Any Forged Image Region (AAAI 2025 · 15 citations)
Use RGB only instead of RGB, infrared, and point cloudMulSen-AD · object-level AUROC0.961 -> 0.911HurtMulti-Sensor Object Anomaly Detection: Unifying Appearance, Geometry, and Internal Properties (CVPR 2025 · 11 citations)
Add the recovery branch3CAD · P-AUROC+6.8%Helped3CAD: A Large-Scale Real-World 3C Product Dataset for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)
include manually labeled anomalies in training dataFT-AED validation (5% FPR) · Miss Percentage25% -> 8.3%HelpedFT-AED: Benchmark Dataset for Early Freeway Traffic Anomalous Event Detection (NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations)
use ATSS as the cropped-image expert model instead of F-RCNNLDXray cropped-image expert test · mAP48.9 -> 51.5HelpedDual-view X-ray Detection: Can AI Detect Prohibited Items from Dual-view X-ray Images like Humans? (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 29 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MVTec-AD · 2 of 29 papers
  • CIFAR10 · 2 of 29 papers
  • LVIS · 2 of 29 papers
  • COCO · 2 of 29 papers

Baselines

  • RD · 3 of 29 papers
  • SimpleNet · 3 of 29 papers
  • DeSTSeg · 2 of 29 papers
  • UniAD · 2 of 29 papers
  • CRAD · 2 of 29 papers
  • F3Net · 2 of 29 papers
  • UCF · 2 of 29 papers
  • Faster R-CNN · 2 of 29 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 85 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy