AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Continual fine-tuning of LLMs

Continual pretraining of language models

Analyzes and mitigates forgetting during continual pretraining and knowledge updating of large models.

66 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Continual fine-tuning of LLMs, keyword cluster “unlearning · multimodal · instruction”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 41 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 30.8% to 21.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 0192020: 1202021: 0212022: 7222023: 5232024: 11242025: 18252026: 2326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

36 papers here report 384 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 22%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add System2 collaborative inference with Pure-MMCIFAR10 Class-IL · accuracy95.54 -> 96.83HelpedInteractive Continual Learning: Fast and Slow Thinking (CVPR 2024 · 20 citations)
use 100 concepts per task instead of 10CUB-200 B-10 Inc-10 · average incremental accuracy79.32 -> 86.07HelpedLanguage Guided Concept Bottleneck Models for Interpretable Continual Learning (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
update attention layers instead of first MLP layers6 CIL sequences (average) · Acc. In.21.34 -> 20.21HurtOvercoming Generic Knowledge Loss with Selective Parameter Update (CVPR 2024 · 10 citations)
Add the review stageOriginal languages · average score47.14 -> 52.12HelpedMoE-LPR: Multilingual Extension of Large Language Models Through Mixture-of-Experts with Language Priors Routing (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Add Memory-Aware ObjectiveStreamingQA · EM18.54 -> 18.36No clear effectCMT: A Memory Compression Method for Continual Knowledge Learning of Large Language Models (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
replace JARe weight increments with promptsBERT benchmark (Orders 4–6, Avg) · accuracy79.0 -> 53.3HurtScalable Language Model with Generalized Continual Learning (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
add patch decoration (weight compensation)Flickr30k target · H-score91.96 -> 93.67HelpedModel Tailor: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Multi-modal Large Language Models (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Add intra-task memory X_cfgSpider-stream-semi · ACC_a (EM)45.6 -> 47.4HelpedFilling Memory Gaps: Enhancing Continual Semantic Parsing via SQL Syntax Variance-Guided LLMs Without Real Data Replay (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Replace the continuous stream of novel data with repeated training on the same 100M tokens after the second epochMixed seven-benchmark evaluation · accuracy differenceHurtHow Much Can We Forget about Data Contamination? (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Add concept-label replay to experience replayCIFAR-100, CUB200, and ImageNet-100 · linear accuracy0.4511 -> 0.7650; 0.1382 -> 0.7914; 0.5903 -> 0.7722HelpedWalking the Web of Concept-Class Relationships in Incrementally Trained Interpretable Models (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
add LR-weighted coefficient ε=0.1 to S_2D_pt (FineWeb) and D_cpt (Knowledge Pile) · Huber LossD_pt: 0.0016 -> 0.0016; D_cpt: 0.0021 -> 0.0025MixedLearning Dynamics in Continual Pre-Training for Large Language Models (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
replace stable EMA (β=0.99) with dynamical EMACoIN benchmark · Avg.ACC+7.24@Avg.ACCHelpedLarge Continual Instruction Assistant (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 24 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CUB-200 · 3 of 24 papers
  • Spider · 2 of 24 papers
  • SlimPajama · 2 of 24 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 24 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 2 of 24 papers
  • ARC-Easy · 2 of 24 papers
  • WinoGrande · 2 of 24 papers
  • PiQA · 2 of 24 papers

Baselines

  • EWC · 5 of 24 papers
  • SFT · 2 of 24 papers
  • EMAR · 2 of 24 papers
  • SFNET · 2 of 24 papers
  • C3 · 2 of 24 papers
  • ProgPrompt · 2 of 24 papers
  • ICICLE · 2 of 24 papers
  • L2P · 2 of 24 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 57 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 30 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy