AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Continual fine-tuning of LLMs

Synthetic data and merging for CLIP

Uses synthetic replay, LoRA recycling and sequential merging to continually adapt vision-language models.

32 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2021–2026) · an approach in Continual fine-tuning of LLMs, keyword cluster “pre trained · lora · fine tuning”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

6 papers in 2023–24 and 25 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 11.5% to 12.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 1212022: 0222023: 1232024: 5242025: 12252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

17 papers here report 204 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 25%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use PKT instead of fine-tuning the pre-trained ViT with prototype classifier ψCUB200 · ALast accuracy3.79±1.47 -> 70.81±0.76HelpedPre-trained Vision and Language Transformers Are Few-Shot Incremental Learners (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
add early-exit knowledge distillation (KD)CIFAR-100 and ImageNet-R · average accuracy88.20 -> 90.83; 88.13 -> 90.06; 82.24 -> 83.42; 79.61 -> 80.77HelpedCL-LoRA: Continual Low-Rank Adaptation for Rehearsal-Free Class-Incremental Learning (CVPR 2025 · 23 citations)
add group sparse lossCOCO, forget one class · APf0.40 vs. 0No clear effectContinual Forgetting for Pre-trained Vision Models (CVPR 2024 · 15 citations)
Add contrastive distillation (CD) to the l2 baselineMTIL Order I · Avg.+7.8HelpedSynthetic Data is an Elegant GIFT for Continual Vision-Language Models (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Add task-specific noise generation and noise mixingCIFAR-100, 10 steps · average accuracy91.18 {{± 0.03}} -> 95.12 {{± 0.05}}HelpedMixture of Noise for Pre-Trained Model-Based Class-Incremental Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)
Vary the projection threshold α8, 14, and 20 task sets · ACCMixedMerging on the Fly Without Retraining: A Sequential Approach to Scalable Continual Model Merging (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
add GPM initialization to PoLoRA-CImageNet-R (10 tasks) · average accuracy (%)50.33 ± 0.91 -> 62.85 ± 0.61HelpedLow-Rank Adaptation in Multilinear Operator Networks for Security-Preserving Incremental Learning (CVPR 2025 · 1 citation)
Use changing instead of fixed noiseSafety alignment · NSFW Score0.4517 -> 0.4345HelpedLeveraging Catastrophic Forgetting to Develop Safe Diffusion Models against Malicious Finetuning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase reminding-stage steps from 5 to 20CIFAR-10 retain set · Accr59.8 -> 65.6HelpedTargeted Forgetting of Image Subgroups in CLIP Models (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
replace hard class mining with random class samplingFew-shot prompt tuning · performanceHurtProxy-FDA: Proxy-based Feature Distribution Alignment for Fine-tuning Vision Foundation Models without Forgetting (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add LADA to BFX-TAIL 16-shot · Average accuracy70.9 -> 72.3HelpedLADA: Scalable Label-Specific CLIP Adapter for Continual Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace equivariant zero convolution with Gaussian-initialized standard convolutionsFine-tuning tasks · performanceHurtGeoAda: Efficiently Finetune Geometric Diffusion Models with Equivariant Adapters (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 13 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-100 · 7 of 13 papers
  • ImageNet-R · 5 of 13 papers
  • EuroSAT · 5 of 13 papers
  • ImageNet-A · 4 of 13 papers
  • DTD · 4 of 13 papers
  • MNIST · 4 of 13 papers
  • Caltech101 · 3 of 13 papers
  • StanfordCars · 3 of 13 papers

Baselines

  • LwF · 5 of 13 papers
  • L2P · 4 of 13 papers
  • DualPrompt · 3 of 13 papers
  • CODA-Prompt · 3 of 13 papers
  • EASE · 3 of 13 papers
  • WiSE-FT · 3 of 13 papers
  • ZSCL · 3 of 13 papers
  • APER · 2 of 13 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 31 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy