AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

Sparse training from scratch

Trains sparse networks with dynamic or random sparsity instead of pruning dense models.

95 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Pruning and efficient tuning, keyword cluster “sparsity · compression · structured”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

30 papers in 2023–24 and 24 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 10.8% to 4.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: ImageNet (top-1 accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 4172018: 3182019: 2192020: 6202021: 10212022: 16222023: 11232024: 19242025: 10252026: 1426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ImageNet · top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 73.32022: 80.1
20192024

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 93.42020: 95.05
20182023

What has been tried

73 papers here report 874 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 19%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add TinyTrain's few-shot meta-training to pre-trainingMeta-Dataset nine-dataset average · top-1 accuracy+5.6 pp on averageHelpedTinyTrain: Resource-Aware Task-Adaptive Sparse Training of DNNs at the Data-Scarce Edge (ICML 2024 · 8 citations)
Learn layer sparsity rates instead of keeping the ERK-initialized rates fixedMultiple sparsity rates; especially RegNetX-400M at 80% sparsity · accuracyabout 10% improvementHelpedFast and Controllable Post-training Sparsity: Learning Optimal Sparsity Allocation with Global Constraint in Minutes (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
use the full-dataset learning-rate schedule without faster decayCIFAR10, 10% · accuracy83.9\% -> 91.7\%HurtRepeated Random Sampling for Minimizing the Time-to-Accuracy of Learning (ICLR 2024 · 7 citations)
Add neuron ablation to constant-fan-in SRigLCIFAR-10, 99% sparsity · test accuracy91.5± 0.3 -> 92.8± 0.1HelpedDynamic Sparse Training with Structured Sparsity (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
add adaptive warmup perturbations instead of using Taylor pruning with SAMImageNet-C, size 0.20 · Top1 accuracy34.49 -> 35.86HelpedAdaptive Sharpness-Aware Pruning for Robust Sparse Networks (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Use uniform rather than greedy soup mergingCIFAR-100, 98% target sparsity, Phase 3, m=10 · accuracy72.44 -> 73.05HelpedSparse Model Soups: A Recipe for Improved Pruning via Model Averaging (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
add BCSR conversion of diagonal matrices for the GPU kernel (vs direct diagonal computation)ImageNet-1K · training time (hrs)18.07 -> 11.42 hrsHelpedDynamic Sparse Training of Diagonally Sparse Networks (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Use a linear sparsity schedule instead of searched layer sparsitiesImageNet ResNet50 Trojan patches · Average AUC95.78 -> 93.51HurtSPADE: Sparsity-Guided Debugging for Deep Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
remove weight rescalingImageNet-1K · top-1 accuracy78.8 -> 78.5HurtS-STE: Continuous Pruning Function for Efficient 2:4 Sparse Pre-training (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add re-training after BLAST16 compressionCommon-sense reasoning benchmarks · Average zero-shot accuracyHelpedBLAST: Block-Level Adaptive Structured Matrices for Efficient Deep Neural Network Inference (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add the projected-point gradient during x-minimizationResNet-20, CIFAR-10, 99.5% sparsity · validation accuracy79.55 (± 0.13) -> 85.85 (± 0.09 )HelpedSAFE: Finding Sparse and Flat Minima to Improve Pruning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase sparsity in large networksDMC Hard · episode returnHelpedNetwork Sparsity Unlocks the Scaling Potential of Deep Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 15 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 15 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 5 of 15 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 4 of 15 papers
  • C4 · 3 of 15 papers
  • WikiText2 · 2 of 15 papers
  • ImageNet · 2 of 15 papers

Baselines

  • SparseGPT · 3 of 15 papers
  • Wanda · 3 of 15 papers
  • ALPS · 2 of 15 papers
  • magnitude pruning · 2 of 15 papers
  • RigL · 2 of 15 papers
  • AC/DC · 2 of 15 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 54 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy