AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

Efficient ViT adaptation

Adapts pre-trained vision transformers with low-rank and factorized parameter-efficient tuning.

62 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Pruning and efficient tuning, keyword cluster “fine tuning · lora · adaptation”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

35 papers in 2023–24 and 16 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 12.6% to 2.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 0202021: 0212022: 10222023: 16232024: 19242025: 8252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

53 papers here report 630 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 26%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
set down-projection ratio rho=1PASCAL-Context four-task average · relative improvement vs. Single-task Full Fine-tuning4.27%HelpedVMT-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Multi-Task Dense Scene Understanding (AAAI 2024 · 62 citations)
replace random token dropping with WPR importance scoringImageNet · Acc@176.8% (-3.0%) -> 78.6% (+1.8%)HelpedZero-TPrune: Zero-Shot Token Pruning through Leveraging of the Attention Graph in Pre-Trained Transformers (CVPR 2024 · 39 citations)
Add the input-side equilibrium layerCIFAR10 · accuracy0.8501 -> 0.8628HelpedLION: Implicit Vision Prompt Tuning (AAAI 2024 · 26 citations)
Add a shared global DWConv after Swish in CSNVTAB-1K · Average accuracy76.7 -> 77.7HelpedDTL: Disentangled Transfer Learning for Visual Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
Add the residual term to left-and-right scalingFGVC · mean accuracy88.9 -> 90.4HelpedLow-Rank Rescaled Vision Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Residual Design Approach (CVPR 2024 · 20 citations)
Choose rank per task from [1..32] instead of using a fixed rankVTAB test sets · average accuracy77.6 -> 77.9HelpedAdapters Strike Back (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
Add MaskedKD during TinyDiT-D14 recoveryImageNet 256×256 · FID5.73 -> 3.73HelpedTinyFusion: Diffusion Transformers Learned Shallow (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
Use DyT with token dispatching before MLP rather than attention dispatchCIFAR-100 · accuracy84.58 -> 91.37HelpedDynamic Tuning Towards Parameter and Inference Efficiency for ViT Adaptation (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
add task prompts and the TPC-operator without DTFPASCAL-Context · relative improvement over single-task fine-tuning+1.3 -> +1.79 (+0.49)HelpedTADFormer: Task-Adaptive Dynamic TransFormer for Efficient Multi-Task Learning (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
Replace LoRA with HTA on Wq and WvVTAB-1k · Mean Total accuracy72.3 -> 72.7HelpedEfficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer via Householder Transformation (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Preserve aspect ratio and high-resolution details with multiscale inputsAVA · PLCC0.734 -> 0.779HelpedCharm: The Missing Piece in ViT Fine-Tuning for Image Aesthetic Assessment (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
use joint singular-value modulation alonePASCAL-MTL · relative improvement over single-task tuning2.77%HelpedDiTASK: Multi-Task Fine-Tuning with Diffeomorphic Transformations (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Food-101 · 3 of 8 papers
  • VTAB-1K · 2 of 8 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 2 of 8 papers
  • Flowers102 · 2 of 8 papers
  • CIFAR100 · 2 of 8 papers
  • FGVC-Aircraft · 2 of 8 papers

Baselines

  • LoRA · 4 of 8 papers
  • BitFit · 3 of 8 papers
  • Adapter · 3 of 8 papers
  • VPT · 3 of 8 papers
  • AdaptFormer · 2 of 8 papers
  • NOAH · 2 of 8 papers
  • SSF · 2 of 8 papers
  • MTLoRA · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 51 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 34 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy