AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Adversarial training recipes

Improve robust training through fast training, pretraining, teacher guidance and local features.

68 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Certified and empirical robustness, keyword cluster “cifar · 10 · imagenet”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 9 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.6% to 3.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 3182019: 6192020: 8202021: 15212022: 8222023: 11232024: 6242025: 5252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

59 papers here report 658 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 22%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
replace full-resolution inputs with resizing to 112×112 during pre-trainingImageNet-1K · PGD-20 robust accuracy54.5 -> 52.5HurtRevisiting Adversarial Training at Scale (CVPR 2024 · 27 citations)
Adding warm-up phase (200 epochs) for the self-supervised part before adversarial training (dynamic training objective scheduling)CIFAR-100 · AA(%) and SA(%)SA +6.83 (51.06→57.89); AA +3.08 (24.96→28.04)Helped3SAT: A Simple Self-Supervised Adversarial Training Framework (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Increase label smoothing from 0.0 to 0.1CIFAR-10 (ℓ∞, ϵ = 8/255) · AA accuracy70.52 -> 71.07HelpedVision Transformers Beat WideResNets on Small Scale Datasets Adversarial Robustness (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Infrequently resample training examples instead of reloading the sampler stateCIFAR10 · performanceNo clear effectAdversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment Studies (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase logit-pairing weight λCIFAR-10 · clean accuracyHurtRAMP: Boosting Adversarial Robustness Against Multiple $l_p$ Perturbations for Universal Robustness (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
reduce JPEG quality parameter ν from 85 to 75 at τ=0.3ImageNet · RA5%HelpedClosing the Gap: Achieving Better Accuracy-Robustness Tradeoffs against Query-Based Attacks (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
Replace multiplicative perturbations with additive Gaussian weight perturbations (DAAP)CIFAR-10/100 and TinyImageNet corruption evaluation · corruption robustnessHurtImproving robustness to corruptions with multiplicative weight perturbations (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
add EWC regularizationcontinual robust training · robust accuracyHurtAdapting to Evolving Adversaries with Regularized Continual Robust Training (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase α from 0.7 to 0.9CIFAR-10, PGD · SA89.81 -> 83.27HurtOptimizing Robustness and Accuracy in Mixture of Experts: A Dual-Model Approach (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add rotation- and scale-equivariant branches to the parallel designCIFAR-100, ε=0.01, PGD · accuracy (%)24.72 -> 29.62HelpedBridging Symmetry and Robustness: On the Role of Equivariance in Enhancing Adversarial Robustness (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Lower epsilon-low while holding epsilon at 12/255Image classification (dataset not specified for the figure) · Natural accuracyHelpedImproving Accuracy-robustness Trade-off via Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Training (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 5 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 4 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 26 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 34 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy