AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Neural network robustness verification

Certify robustness with semidefinite, probabilistic or bound-propagation verifiers.

87 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Certified and empirical robustness, keyword cluster “verification · bounds · worst case”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

27 papers in 2023–24 and 13 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.9% to 5.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 5182019: 12192020: 13202021: 12212022: 5222023: 12232024: 15242025: 7252026: 626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

72 papers here report 656 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 19%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add orthogonal FC layerMNIST, PGD ε=8/255 · accuracy23.23 -> 50.35HelpedLyapunov-Stable Deep Equilibrium Models (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Add RCT to PTT with HPS base scoreCIFAR10 · average prediction set size2.294 -> 2.294No clear effectProvably Robust Conformal Prediction with Improved Efficiency (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
add 8 Spatial-MLP blocks after the last convolution layersCIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, ε=36/255 · VRA (%)70.0 -> 70.2; 41.5 -> 41.2MixedA Recipe for Improved Certifiable Robustness (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Vary search angle, initialization shift, and random seedMNIST · distribution of verifiable ball centersHelpedLEVIS: Large Exact Verifiable Input Spaces for Neural Networks (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add the redundant quadratic tautology constraints to the tighter first-order SDPBNN verification, affine objective · lower boundHelpedVerifying Properties of Binary Neural Networks Using Sparse Polynomial Optimization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the size of the delta setFIRE, ε=25% · Baseline SNRHelpedSupport is All You Need for Certified VAE Training (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add cross-executional bound refinement rather than individual bound refinementMNIST DiffAI, 2-UAP · LP bound t-0.2 -> -0.05HelpedRelational DNN Verification With Cross Executional Bound Refinement (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
remove finite-sample correctionCIFAR-10 feature poisoning, r=0.12, k=3 · average set size1.84 -> 1.83No clear effectRobust Yet Efficient Conformal Prediction Sets (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
use strong bounding instead of strong branching aloneCIFAR10 and MNIST networks in Table 1 · worst-case UAP accuracy63.8 (+1.6) vs 63.2 (+1.0); 83.0 (+3.0) vs 83.8 (+3.8)MixedRelational Verification Leaps Forward with RABBit (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase ε to 0.3MNIST · accuracyabove 90% -> 80%HurtVNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 6 of 10 papers
  • MNIST · 5 of 10 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 40 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy