AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Open-vocabulary 3D scene understanding

Aligns 3D scenes with language for open-world, part-level and affordance understanding.

95 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in 3D generation, keyword cluster “layout · indoor · 3d scene”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 49 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.6% to 5.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 2172018: 3182019: 3192020: 5202021: 6212022: 5222023: 6232024: 15242025: 21252026: 2826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

65 papers here report 653 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 78%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 17%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add regional captions instead of using view- and entity-level language supervisionScanNet B0/N17 · mIoU†21.7 -> 50.6HelpedRegionPLC: Regional Point-Language Contrastive Learning for Open-World 3D Scene Understanding (CVPR 2024 · 59 citations)
add scene-graph guidance with node-wise and edge-wise prompts30 multi-object scenes (number of objects ≥2) · CLIP score (mean)0.3019 -> 0.3326HelpedGraphDreamer: Compositional 3D Scene Synthesis from Scene Graphs (CVPR 2024 · 43 citations)
Add coarse-to-fine mask expansion with r0=0.1Functionality segmentation test · AP250.0 -> 26.6HelpedSceneFun3D: Fine-Grained Functionality and Affordance Understanding in 3D Scenes (CVPR 2024 · 36 citations)
Use maximum coverage rather than uniform sampling with 8 framesScanRefer · Acc@0.2548.93 -> 53.47HelpedVideo-3D LLM: Learning Position-Aware Video Representation for 3D Scene Understanding (CVPR 2025 · 34 citations)
Use learnable object identifier tokens instead of plain-text identifiersScanRefer validation · Acc@0.547.2 -> 50.2HelpedChat-Scene: Bridging 3D Scene and Large Language Models with Object Identifiers (NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations)
Use ground-truth rather than estimated depthiGibson-Synthetic · mAP69.09 -> 79.46HelpedPanoContext-Former: Panoramic Total Scene Understanding with a Transformer (CVPR 2024 · 18 citations)
retain scene memory across navigation subtasks instead of clearing it after each subtaskGOAT-Bench Val Unseen subset · Success Rate58.6 -> 69.1Helped3D-Mem: 3D Scene Memory for Embodied Exploration and Reasoning (CVPR 2025 · 16 citations)
add viewpoint prediction and viewpoint data augmentationScanRefer · Acc@0.2551.7 -> 55.65HelpedViewpoint-Aware Visual Grounding in 3D Scenes (CVPR 2024 · 16 citations)
Add assistive object tags to interactive-element detection promptsSceneFun3D · overall node recall R@359.3 -> 73.0HelpedOpen-Vocabulary Functional 3D Scene Graphs for Real-World Indoor Spaces (CVPR 2025 · 15 citations)
Reduce SPAR-7M proportion from 60% to 40%CV-Bench 2D · score73.00 → 74.13HelpedFrom Flatland to Space: Teaching Vision-Language Models to Perceive and Reason in 3D (NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations)
replace the spatial encoder with an MLP for direct object location encodingNr3D Overall · accuracy64.4% -> 45.0% ± 0.4%HurtMiKASA: Multi-Key-Anchor & Scene-Aware Transformer for 3D Visual Grounding (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
Add depth inputINS testing · PSNR29.95 -> 30.38HelpedOmniSR: Shadow Removal Under Direct and Indirect Lighting (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 25 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ScanRefer · 8 of 25 papers
  • SQA3D · 7 of 25 papers
  • ScanQA · 7 of 25 papers
  • ScanNet · 6 of 25 papers
  • Scan2Cap · 6 of 25 papers
  • Matterport3D · 5 of 25 papers
  • Multi3DRefer · 4 of 25 papers
  • Structured3D · 3 of 25 papers

Baselines

  • LEO · 7 of 25 papers
  • ChatScene · 5 of 25 papers
  • Scene-LLM · 5 of 25 papers
  • 3D-VisTA · 4 of 25 papers
  • 3D-LLM · 4 of 25 papers
  • LL3DA · 4 of 25 papers
  • GPT-4o · 3 of 25 papers
  • PQ3D · 3 of 25 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 70 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy