atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

FAMNet: Frequency-aware Matching Network for Cross-domain Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Cross-domain few-shot with transformers · 29 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FAMNet, a frequency-aware prototype matching network for cross-domain few-shot medical image segmentation, evaluated on cross-modality, cross-sequence (cardiac) and cross-institution-style settings.

Problem

Few-shot medical image segmentation models fail under domain shift from different imaging techniques (e.g., CT vs MRI, LGE vs b-SSFP), where support-query bias and inter-domain differences degrade segmentation.

Approach

Decompose support and query foreground features into low, mid and high frequency bands via FFT, apply distinct attention weightings (similar-component emphasis for domain-agnostic bands, suppression for domain-specific bands), then fuse bands with cross-attention guided by the mid-frequency band to suppress domain-variant information.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FAMNet rather than SSL-ALPAbdominal CT → MRI · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 63.01 -> 65.79Helped
Use FAMNet rather than PATNetAbdominal MRI → CT · Abdominal MRI → CTDice: 57.29 -> 64.75Helped
Use FAMNet rather than IFACardiac LGE → b-SSFP · Cardiac LGE → b-SSFPDice: 62.28 -> 71.58Helped
Use FAMNet rather than PATNetCardiac b-SSFP → LGE · Cardiac b-SSFP → LGEDice: 60.06 -> 61.39Helped
Add CPG to PANet baseline (ablation)PANet baseline · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 32.46 -> 53.97Helped
Add FAM to the CPG-equipped baseline (ablation)PANet baseline with CPG · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 53.97 -> 62.02Helped
Add MSF to the CPG- and FAM-equipped baseline (ablation)PANet baseline with CPG and FAM · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 62.02 -> 65.79Helped
Use attention rather than inverse attention for the high-frequency band (ablation)FAMNet · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 65.79 -> 61.29Hurt
Use attention rather than inverse attention for the low-frequency band (ablation)FAMNet · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 65.79 -> 60.02Hurt
Use attention rather than inverse attention for both low- and high-frequency bands (ablation)FAMNet · Abdominal CT → MRIDice: 65.79 -> 58.68Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Abdominal MRI (20 T2-SPIR scans) Abdominal CT (20 scans) Cardiac LGE/b-SSFP MRI (45 + 45 scans) Prostate T2-weighted MRI (UCLH, NCI) for cross-institution

Benchmarks: Abdominal CT to MRI and MRI to CT (cross-modality) Cardiac LGE to b-SSFP and b-SSFP to LGE (cross-sequence)

Metrics: Dice score

Baselines: PANet SSL-ALPNet ADNet QNet CATNet RPT PATNet IFA

Builds on: PANet PATNet SSL-ALPNet CATNet ADNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy