atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Dual-Agent Optimization framework for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Segmentation

CVPR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Cross-domain few-shot with transformers · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DATO, a dual-agent framework for cross-domain few-shot segmentation that uses adversarially trained frequency-domain agents to make features domain-invariant and agent-based correlations to rectify support-query matching.

Problem

Cross-domain few-shot segmentation suffers performance drops because of feature domain sensitivity and support-to-query matching domain sensitivity when a model trained on a source domain is transferred to unseen target domains.

Approach

Jointly optimizes features in the frequency domain via adversarially trained agents (perturbing low-frequency components with ALOFT) and rectifies matching in the spatial domain by correlating pixels with the agent-aggregated domain-invariant feature set, so the two procedures are coupled through the shared agents.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use DATO instead of DMTNetResNet-50 CD-FSS segmentation · Chest X-ray 1-shot and 5-shotmIoU: 73.74 -> 79.58; 77.30 -> 81.07Helped
use DATO instead of IFAResNet-50 CD-FSS segmentation · ISIC, FSS-1000, and Deepglobe (1-shot and 5-shot)mIoU: 66.30 -> 68.76; 69.80 -> 70.30; 80.10 -> 81.79; 82.40 -> 84.61; 50.60 -> 51.10; 58.80 -> 59.30Helped
use DATO instead of IFAResNet-50 CD-FSS segmentation · CD-FSS average, 1-shot and 5-shotmIoU: 67.80 -> 70.31; 71.40 -> 73.82Helped
add agent enhancement (ablation)DATO · CD-FSS benchmark, 1-shotmIoU: 60.00 -> 65.45Helped
add agent enhancement (ablation)DATO · CD-FSS benchmark, 5-shotmIoU: 68.00 -> 70.24Helped
add diversity loss (ablation)DATO with CMA enhancement · CD-FSS benchmark, 1-shotmIoU: 65.45 -> 67.71Helped
add diversity loss (ablation)DATO with CMA enhancement · CD-FSS benchmark, 5-shotmIoU: 70.24 -> 71.31Helped
add correlation rectification strategy (ablation)DATO with CMA and diversity loss · CD-FSS benchmark, 1-shotmIoU: 67.71 -> 70.31Helped
add correlation rectification strategy (ablation)DATO with CMA and diversity loss · CD-FSS benchmark, 5-shotmIoU: 71.31 -> 73.82Helped
vary the number of agents from 20 to 60 (ablation)DATO · CD-FSS benchmark, 1-shotmIoU: 69.93; 69.98; 70.15; 70.17; 70.22; 70.31; 70.23; 70.20; 70.22Mixed
vary diversity loss weight (ablation)DATO · CD-FSS benchmark, 1-shotmIoU: 70.03; 70.11; 70.31; 70.08Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PASCAL VOC 2012 SBD Chest X-ray ISIC FSS-1000 Deepglobe

Benchmarks: Chest X-ray ISIC FSS-1000 Deepglobe

Metrics: mIoU FB-IoU

Baselines: PATNet RestNet DMTNet APSeg ABCDFSS DR-Adapter APM IFA PerSAM HDMNet FPTrans

Builds on: SSP ALOFT PATNet IFA

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy