atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Lightweight Frequency Masker for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Domain-generalized segmentation · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a lightweight frequency masker (APM plus ACPA) inserted into a frozen source-trained FSS backbone to reduce inter-channel correlation and improve cross-domain few-shot segmentation on four target datasets.

Problem

Few-shot segmentation methods degrade sharply when transferred from a source domain (PASCAL-5i) to distant target domains (FSS-1000, Deepglobe, ISIC2018, Chest X-ray) in cross-domain few-shot segmentation.

Approach

Filtering frequency components (amplitude and phase) of target-domain features, learned adaptively on the support set, reduces inter-channel correlation and channel bias, enlarging activated regions; an amplitude-phase masker and a phase-driven channel attention (ACPA) implement this with very few extra parameters, without source-domain retraining.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add APM-S to the HSNet baseline (ablation)HSNet* · CD-FSS average, 1-shotmIoU: 47.68 -> 57.77Helped
Add APM-S to the HSNet baseline (ablation)HSNet* · CD-FSS average, 5-shotmIoU: 50.10 -> 61.39Helped
Add ACPA to APM-S (ablation)APM-S · CD-FSS average, 1-shotmIoU: +1.16%Helped
Add ACPA to APM-S (ablation)APM-S · CD-FSS average, 5-shotmIoU: +1.47%Helped
Use APM-M instead of APM-S, with ACPA (ablation)Frequency masker · CD-FSS average, 1-shotmIoU: 58.93 -> 60.03Helped
Use APM-M instead of APM-S, with ACPA (ablation)Frequency masker · CD-FSS average, 5-shotmIoU: 62.86 -> 65.18Helped
Apply coarse high-low frequency filtering at the input levelSource-trained model · FSS-1000, 1-shotmIoU: 77.54 -> 64.34Hurt
Apply frequency filtering at the input levelSource-trained model · Deepglobe, 1-shotmIoU: 33.19 -> 40.42Helped
Apply frequency filtering at the input levelSource-trained model · ISIC, 1-shotmIoU: 32.65 -> 33.16Helped
Apply low-frequency amplitude filtering at the input levelSource-trained model · Chest X-ray, 1-shotmIoU: 47.34 -> 61.58Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PASCAL-5i SDS annotations FSS-1000 Deepglobe ISIC2018 Chest X-ray

Benchmarks: FSS-1000 Deepglobe ISIC2018 Chest X-ray

Metrics: mIoU mutual information CKA

Baselines: PGNet PANet CaNet RPMMs PFENet RePRI HSNet PATNet FPTrans PerSAM DFF GFNet

Builds on: HSNet SENet DFF DAC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy