atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Bayesian optimization

Context in Public Health for Underserved Communities: A Bayesian Approach to Online Restless Bandits

AAAI 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Bayesian optimization · approach: Regret bounds for Bayesian optimization · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes BCoR, a hierarchical Bayesian Thompson-sampling method with Whittle index policy for online contextual, non-stationary restless bandits, evaluated on simulations and a data-driven ARMMAN maternal health simulator.

Problem

Allocating scarce interventions to improve adherence in public health programs when RMAB transition dynamics are unknown, horizons are short, and budgets are small relative to the number of arms; existing online RMAB RL methods ignore context and non-stationarity.

Approach

Model arm transition probabilities with a hierarchical Bayesian probit model that shares information within arms (passive to active transitions), across arms (covariates with a shared mean), and over time (spline time effects), then run Thompson sampling by plugging posterior draws into a Whittle index policy.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use BCoR instead of the next-best methodARMMAN data-driven simulator · ARMMAN data-driven simulator, B=10engagement: 61% increaseHelped
Use BCoR instead of the strongest competing approachRMAB simulation with informative covariates and partial misspecification · Figure (c)time-averaged reward: more than doubleHelped
Use BCoR instead of existing approachesRMAB simulations with covariate structure · Figures (a–c)time-averaged rewardHelped
Use BCoR instead of other approachesRMAB simulation with non-stationarity and uninformative covariates · Figure (d)time-averaged rewardHelped
Use any compared learning method instead of random selectionRMAB simulation with no information sharing or stationarity · Figure (e)time-averaged rewardNo clear effect
Use Greedy instead of Whittle policyBCoR and TS · Simulation experimentstime-averaged rewardNo clear effect
Use any of the three Whittle oracle variantsWhittle index oracle · Simulation and ARMMAN data-driven experimentstime-averaged rewardNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ARMMAN anonymized covariate data (24,011 beneficiaries, 2022) simulated RMAB instances

Benchmarks: simulated RMAB settings (N=400, T=50) ARMMAN data-driven simulator (N=500, T=40)

Metrics: time-averaged reward percent engagement increase over next-best method

Baselines: UCWhittle Thompson sampling per-arm (TS) Random Whittle oracle Greedy oracle

Builds on: Whittle index policy Thompson sampling UCWhittle

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy