atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Cooperative multi-agent RL

Expected Return Symmetries

ICLR 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Cooperative multi-agent RL · approach: MARL benchmarks and grouping · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces expected return symmetries (ER symmetries), a broader symmetry group than Dec-POMDP symmetries, learned from interaction via gradient-based search, and uses them in other-play to improve zero-shot coordination in Hanabi, Overcooked V2 and toy games.

Problem

Zero-shot coordination in cooperative Dec-POMDPs suffers from mutually incompatible symmetry breaking; existing other-play requires a priori known environment symmetries, which are hard to discover automatically in large Dec-POMDPs.

Approach

Define a symmetry group of action-observation relabelings that preserves the self-play optimal set of Boltzmann-exploratory policies (rather than the environment dynamics), which strictly contains Dec-POMDP symmetries, and learn approximate elements of it with policy-gradient optimization over observation permutations plus fixed action transpositions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use OP with learned expected return symmetries instead of self-playIPPO population · HanabiXP: 4.02 ± 0.17 -> 21.64 ± 0.07Helped
Use OP with learned expected return symmetries instead of OP over Dec-POMDP symmetriesIPPO population · HanabiXP: 8.61 ± 0.17 -> 21.64 ± 0.07Helped
Use OP with learned expected return symmetries instead of self-playIPPO population · Overcooked V2, Grounded Coordination Simplemean XP: 6.74 -> 15.8Helped
Enforce compositionality and invertibility in ER symmetry learning (ablation)ER symmetry learning · Hanabi, 6 unseen optimal policiesRel. Rec. Loss: 31.4% ± 1.8% -> 16.7% ± 0.18%Helped
Enforce compositionality and invertibility in ER symmetry learning (ablation)ER symmetry learning · Hanabi, 6 unseen optimal policiesSingle Transform: 22.88 ± 0.07 -> 23.32 ± 0.05Helped
Enforce compositionality and invertibility in ER symmetry learning (ablation)ER symmetry learning · Hanabi, 6 unseen optimal policiesDouble Comp.: 21.10 ± 0.09 -> 22.16 ± 0.07Helped
Enforce compositionality and invertibility in ER symmetry learning (ablation)ER symmetry learning · Hanabi, 6 unseen optimal policiesTriple Comp.: 20.36 ± 0.11 -> 20.94 ± 0.12Helped
Apply the ER symmetrizer at test timeHanabi IPPO + OP^ER population · HanabiXP(*): 22.03 ± 0.05 -> 22.50 ± 0.06Helped
Apply the ER symmetrizer at test timeHanabi IPPO + OP^MDP population · HanabiXP(*): 8.14 ± 0.15 -> 9.91 ± 0.14Helped
Apply the MDP symmetrizer at test timeHanabi IPPO population · HanabiXP(*): 0.12 ± 0.03 -> 0.14 ± 0.03No clear effect
Apply the ER symmetrizer at test timeHanabi IPPO population · HanabiXP(*): 0.12 ± 0.03 -> 0.10 ± 0.03No clear effect
Use OP over Dec-POMDP symmetries in the two-lever variantOP^MDP · Two-lever gamezero-shot coordinationHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Hanabi Overcooked V2 Iterated three-lever game Toy coordination game

Benchmarks: Hanabi Overcooked V2 (Grounded Coordination Simple) Iterated three-lever game Toy coordination game

Metrics: self-play score cross-play score median cross-play score expected return

Baselines: IPPO self-play IPPO + OP with Dec-POMDP symmetries off-belief learning cognitive hierarchy

Builds on: other-play zero-shot coordination off-belief learning IPPO JaxMARL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy