atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

AgentStudio: A Toolkit for Building General Virtual Agents

ICLR 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: Agentic benchmarks and orchestration · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces AgentStudio, a lightweight online environment with generic video/image observations and GUI+API actions, plus tools, a 205-task online benchmark, and three datasets (GroundUI, IDMBench, CriticBench) for decomposing virtual-agent abilities.

Problem

Existing virtual-agent environments are domain-specific, hard to set up, lack video observations and combined GUI/API actions, and evaluations rarely decompose fundamental agent capabilities such as GUI grounding, learning from videos, and success detection.

Approach

A generic online environment whose observation space (text, image, video) and action space (GUI keyboard/mouse plus API/code) are universal, paired with authoring tools (task creation with auto-evaluators, GUI element annotation, video action labeling) and three fine-grained datasets that each isolate one agent ability.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use screenshot observations in addition to text (Single-GUI OS vs Single-API OS) (ablation)GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet · AgentStudio Single-API vs Single-GUI OS taskssuccess rate (%)No clear effect
Add screenshot observations (Single-GUI OS vs Single-API OS) (ablation)Gemini models · AgentStudio Single-API vs Single-GUI OS taskssuccess rate (%)Hurt
Include action information alongside observations in CriticBench (ablation)VLMs as critics · CriticBenchF1 score: limited benefitHelped
Switch from single-step (IDM-Single) to multi-step action labeling (IDM-Multiple)VLMs as IDMs · IDMBenchaccuracy (%): large drop, e.g. Claude 61.4 to 12.5Hurt
Recaption ambiguous/incorrect GUI instructions with GPT-4o (ablation)GroundUI-1K grounding evaluation · GroundUI-1KaccuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Mind2Web AITW VisualWebArena ScreenSpot OmniACT MoTIF

Benchmarks: AgentStudio online benchmark (205 tasks) GroundUI-1K IDMBench CriticBench

Metrics: success rate grounding accuracy accuracy F1 score edit distance

Baselines: GPT-4o Claude 3.5 Sonnet Gemini 1.5 Pro Gemini 1.5 Flash SeeClick CogAgent Qwen-VL-Chat

Builds on: WebArena OSWorld AndroidWorld Mind2Web SeeClick

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy