atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at Scale

ICML 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: LLM multi-agent collaboration and safety · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Windows Agent Arena, a scalable benchmark of 154 Windows OS tasks with execution-based evaluation parallelized on Azure, plus the OmniParser-based GPT-4V agent NAVI reaching 19.5% success versus 74.5% for humans.

Problem

Existing computer-use agent benchmarks are either modality/domain-limited or too slow to evaluate (days per full run), and none provide a realistic, scalable real-OS environment for Windows, the most common desktop OS.

Approach

Adapt the OSWorld framework to a real Windows 11 VM running in Docker containers, with per-task JSON configs and execution-based evaluators, and parallelize one worker per task on Azure ML so a full run takes about 20 minutes; a baseline agent (NAVI) combines UIA-tree and pixel-based Set-of-Marks (OmniParser) with a VLM.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add UIA markers to pixel-based Omniparser (ablation)Navi with GPT-4V-1106 · Windows Agent Arenasuccess rate: 12.5% -> 19.5%Helped
add image input to SoM (DOM + Pixel) (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebStep Success Rate: 35.1% -> 45.2%Helped
add pixel SoM to Image + SoM (DOM) (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebStep Success Rate: 40.7% -> 45.2%Helped
replace text-only DOM input with Image+SoM (DOM + Pixel) (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebStep Success Rate: 24.6% -> 45.2%Helped
use Image+SoM (DOM + Pixel) instead of Image+SoM (DOM) (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebOperation F1: 84.3% -> 85.8%Helped
use Image+SoM (DOM + Pixel) instead of SoM (Pixel) (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebElement Accuracy: 40.6% -> 47.3%Helped
use Image+SoM (DOM + Pixel) instead of the SeeAct configurationNavi versus SeeAct · Mind2WebOperation F1: 71.8% -> 85.8%Helped
use the strongest Navi configuration instead of the text-only DOM configuration (ablation)Navi with GPT-4o · Mind2WebElement Accuracy: 26.3% -> 47.3%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OSWorld task configurations (adapted) Mind2Web

Benchmarks: Windows Agent Arena Mind2Web

Metrics: task success rate element accuracy operation F1 step success rate

Baselines: GPT-4o GPT-4o-mini Phi3-V GPT-4V-1106 SeeAct

Builds on: OSWorld Set-of-Marks chain-of-thought

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy