Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning
Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Rate-Reward Trade-off in Markov Decision Processes
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Characterizes the capacity-reward trade-off for communicating through MDP actions (action-state channel) and proposes Act2Comm, a transformer-based learned joint control/coding scheme that embeds messages into a target policy's actions.
Problem
Communicating messages implicitly through an agent's actions in an MDP, where the receiver observes only states, creating a trade-off between transmission rate/reliability and average reward.
Approach
Treats the MDP as a finite-state channel with actions as input and next states as output; derives a single-letter capacity and a concave rate-reward formulation, then learns a transformer encoder/decoder with a critic network that handles the non-differentiable channel and quantizer, while the encoder's policy mimics a target control policy.
Key results
- In Catch the Ball with p=0, Act2Comm communicates at rate 0.2 with zero error while reward drops from 1.66 to 1.5.
- Relaxing BER to 1e-4 achieves the same rate with reward 1.6 in Catch the Ball.
- Lowering the reward constraint yields more reliable communication at the same rate in Lucky Wheel.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communicate at rate 0.2 while accepting a reward reduction from 1.66 to 1.5 | Act2Comm · Catch the Ball (p=0) | BER: no error | Helped |
| Relax the BER target from no error to 10^{-4} at the same rate | Act2Comm · Catch the Ball (p=0) | reward: 1.5 -> 1.6 | Helped |
| Use a large control-loss weight λ, making the coding policy mirror the deterministic target policy | Act2Comm · Lucky Wheel | BER: BER is 0.5 | Hurt |
| Use a noisy action-state channel (p=0.2) instead of the perfect channel (p=0) | Act2Comm · Catch the Ball | rate | Hurt |
Surprising findings
- The capacity of the action-state channel is achieved by a stationary randomized policy without relying on history.
Limitations
- Achieving capacity requires infinite code length, so the theory gives only an upper bound for practical codes.
- Communication through actions costs control performance and can drive the policy to deterministic behavior with zero communication capability when the reward constraint is tight.
Experimental setup
Benchmarks: Lucky Wheel Catch the Ball Erratic robot
Metrics: bit error rate average reward coding rate
Builds on: finite-state channel capacity theory Shannon's method for channel conversion emergent communication
Closest papers by meaning
- Communicating via Markov Decision Processes (ICML 2022 · similarity 0.90)
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Communication-Constrained Priors (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.88)
- Multi-Agent Coordination via Multi-Level Communication (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- Narrowing the Collaboration Gap, Probably (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.86)
- RGMComm: Return Gap Minimization via Discrete Communications in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- Learning Weakly Communicating Average-Reward CMDPs: Strong Duality and Improved Regret (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.85)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
