atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Games and equilibria

Impartial Selection with Predictions

NeurIPS 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Games and equilibria · approach: Strategic classification · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies impartial mutual-nomination selection when a predicted top set is available, giving consistency-robustness trade-offs for 1-, 2- and k-selection via permutation-based mechanisms.

Problem

Impartial selection of agents based on mutual nominations, where mechanisms have been limited to weak approximation guarantees; the question is how much a prediction of the top-indegree set can improve them while remaining robust to bad predictions.

Approach

Extends permutation-based impartial mechanisms by placing predicted vertices at fixed positions (e.g., end of permutation or at position rho, or both ends) so their incoming edges are likely observed, giving consistency-robustness trade-offs that are near-optimal and tight for several settings.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Place the predicted vertex last in the permutationUniform permutation mechanism on plurality graphs · Plurality graphs, 1-selectionconsistency: \frac{2}{3} -> 1Helped
Place the predicted vertex last in the permutationUniform permutation mechanism on plurality graphs · Plurality graphs, 1-selectionrobustness: \frac{2}{3} -> \frac{1}{2}Hurt
Place the predicted vertex at both ends across the forward and reverse permutationsBidirectional permutation mechanism · General approval voting, 2-selectionconsistency: \frac{1}{2} -> 1Helped
Place the predicted vertex at both ends across the forward and reverse permutationsBidirectional permutation mechanism · General approval voting, 2-selectionrobustness: \frac{1}{2} -> \frac{1}{2}No clear effect
Place one predicted vertex in each partition and bias its position to ρk-partition mechanism · General approval voting, k-selectionconsistency: 1-\frac{1- ho}{k}Helped
Place one predicted vertex in each partition and bias its position to ρk-partition mechanism · General approval voting, k-selectionrobustness: \bigl(1-\frac{2\rho}{k+1}\bigr) \bigl(1-\bigl(\frac{k-1}{k}\bigr)^k\bigr)Mixed
Use the ρ-partition mechanism with ρ=1 instead of ρ=\frac{1}{2} (ablation)ρ-partition mechanism · General approval voting, k-selectionconsistency: 1-\frac{1}{2k} -> 1Helped
Use the ρ-partition mechanism with ρ=1 instead of ρ=\frac{1}{2} (ablation)ρ-partition mechanism · General approval voting, k-selectionrobustness: \frac{1}{2} -> \frac{1}{4} (k=2); \frac{19}{36} -> \frac{19}{54} (k=3); \frac{35}{64} -> \frac{105}{256} (k=4)Hurt
Use the ρ-partition mechanism with ρ=\frac{1}{2} instead of ρ=1 (ablation)ρ-partition mechanism · General approval voting, k-selectionrobustness: \frac{1}{4} -> \frac{1}{2} (k=2); \frac{19}{54} -> \frac{19}{36} (k=3); \frac{105}{256} -> \frac{35}{64} (k=4)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: consistency robustness approximation ratio of indegree sum

Baselines: uniform permutation mechanism bidirectional permutation mechanism k-partition mechanism with permutation baseline lottery mechanism

Builds on: permutation mechanism bidirectional permutation mechanism k-partition mechanism with permutation robustness-consistency framework

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy