Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins
Hephaestus: Mixture Generative Modeling with Energy Guidance for Large-scale QoS Degradation
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes Hephaestus, a Forge-Morph-Refine generative framework (PPS approximation with SPAGAN estimator, energy-guided mixture of conditional VAEs, and latent-space RL) for the nonlinear Quality of Service Degradation problem on networks.
Problem
Quality of Service Degradation (QoSD): an adversary increases edge weights under budget constraints to push shortest paths of critical source-target pairs above a threshold; existing ML methods only handle linear, small-scale variants and classical methods rely on combinatorial optimization.
Approach
Combines a shortest-path-attention-guided approximation (PPS) to generate a feasible solution dataset, an energy-based model that guides a mixture of conditional VAEs with dynamically added experts, and an RL agent that refines latent codes using a differentiable feasibility-and-cost reward, handling nonlinear edge-cost functions.
Key results
- On Skitter at T=260%, Hephaestus reduces total cost by 28.1% versus the second-best method DIFFILO (2199372 vs about 3.01M).
- On RoadCA, Hephaestus reduces total cost by 16.8% versus DIFFILO at the highest threshold.
- On linear-cost Email and Gnutella at T=260%, Hephaestus is slightly better than DIFFILO (9601 vs 9695; 10495 vs 10987), but slightly worse at 140% in some cases.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use Hephaestus instead of DIFFILO | QoSD solutions on Skitter at threshold 260% · Skitter 260% | total cost: 28.1% | Helped |
| Use Hephaestus instead of DIFFILO | QoSD solutions on RoadCA at threshold 260% · RoadCA 260% | total cost: 16.8% | Helped |
| Use Hephaestus instead of DIFFILO | QoSD solutions on Gnutella at threshold 260% · Gnutella 260% | total cost: 4.5% | Helped |
| Use Hephaestus instead of DIFFILO | QoSD solutions on Gnutella at threshold 140% · Gnutella 140% | total cost: 7 units | Hurt |
| Add more experts to the Mix-CVAE (ablation) | Mix-CVAE guided by EBM on the synthetic dataset · Synthetic maximum-density graph | distribution alignment: from 3 to 9 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- On Email and Gnutella at lowest thresholds, the exact solver and DiffILO outperform Hephaestus, so the advantage is mainly at high thresholds and large graphs.
Limitations
- Quality depends on the initial solutions from the approximation algorithm used in Forge.
- Generalization to unseen graphs depends on the GNN estimator (SPAGAN) and graph representation quality.
- No error bars or statistical significance reported.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Email Gnutella RoadCA Skitter synthetic Erdős–Rényi graphs
Benchmarks: Email Gnutella RoadCA Skitter synthetic Erdős–Rényi (n=1024)
Metrics: total perturbation budget (lower is better)
Baselines: Adaptive Trading Iterative Greedy Sampling Algorithm DiffILO Predict-and-Search L-MILPOPT Exact Solver (Gurobi)
Builds on: CVAE energy-based models Predict-and-Search DiffILO Gurobi
Closest papers by meaning
- Divide, Harmonize, Then Conquer It: Shooting Multi-Commodity Flow Problems with Multimodal Language Models (ICLR 2026 · similarity 0.81)
- ResMAS: Resilience Optimization in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems (AAAI 2026 · similarity 0.81)
- Stability and Diversity of Networked Self-Consuming Generative Ecosystems (NeurIPS 2026 · similarity 0.81)
- MESS+: Dynamically Learned Inference-Time LLM Routing in Model Zoos with Service Level Guarantees (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.81)
- Random Policy Evaluation Uncovers Policies of Generative Flow Networks (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.81)
- Towards Robust Learning to Optimize with Theoretical Guarantees (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.81)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
