atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplay

NeurIPS 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: Agentic benchmarks and orchestration · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes APIGen-MT, a two-phase pipeline that generates verified task blueprints with LLM committee review and then simulates multi-turn human-agent trajectories, and uses the data to train xLAM-2-fc-r models (1B–70B) that top BFCL v3 and τ-bench.

Problem

Multi-turn agent training data with realistic human-agent dynamics and verifiable ground-truth actions is scarce and expensive to collect manually.

Approach

Separate data generation into a verified task "blueprint" phase (format/execution/policy checks, LLM review committee with majority voting, reflection-based feedback loops, reverse task recombination) and a simulated human-agent interplay phase that collects only trajectories that pass state-based and output-based checks.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train on APIGen-MT synthetic multi-turn dataxLAM-2-70b-fc-r · τ-bench overallsuccess rate: 56.2 vs 52.9Helped
Train on APIGen-MT synthetic multi-turn dataxLAM-2-70b-fc-r · BFCL v3 overalloverall accuracy: 78.19 vs 74.31Helped
Train on APIGen-MT synthetic multi-turn dataxLAM-2-8b-fc-r · BFCL v3 multi-turnmulti-turn accuracy: 69.25 vs 58.75Helped
Use Best-of-N (N=4) user simulation with self-critique instead of naive user simulationgpt-4o test assistant · τ-Retailsuccess rate average: 62.8 -> 67.0Helped
Use Best-of-N (N=4) user simulation with self-critique instead of naive user simulationxLAM-2-70b-fc-r test assistant · τ-Retailsuccess rate average: 67.1 -> 68.8Helped
Use Best-of-N (N=4) user simulation with self-critique instead of naive user simulationgpt-4o test assistant · τ-Retailsuccess rate variance: 11.1 -> 2.6Helped
Use Best-of-N (N=4) user simulation with self-critique instead of naive user simulationxLAM-2-70b-fc-r test assistant · τ-Retailsuccess rate variance: 9.7 -> 4.0Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: τ-bench retail and airline APIs and policies PersonaHub APIGen-MT-5k

Benchmarks: BFCL v3 τ-bench

Metrics: overall accuracy multi-turn accuracy pass@1 pass^k success rate variance

Baselines: gpt-4o o1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude 3.7 Sonnet DeepSeek V3 Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Qwen 2.5 32B Instruct watt-tool-70b ToolACE-8B

Builds on: APIGen τ-bench PersonaHub Agent-FLAN LLaMA-Factory

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy