atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

A Multiagent Path Search Algorithm for Large-Scale Coalition Structure Generation

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Combinatorial and search optimization · approach: Monte Carlo tree search · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SALDAE, an anytime multiagent path-search algorithm over the coalition structure graph that uses split/merge bridging paths between best solutions, memory lists, and conflict resolution to solve coalition structure generation at scale.

Problem

Coalition structure generation (CSG): optimally partitioning agents into coalitions to maximize social welfare, which is intractable exactly for large numbers of agents and needs good anytime solutions under tight run times.

Approach

Treats CSG as multiagent path finding on the coalition structure graph: search agents expand nodes via splits/merges, and after each improvement they build bridging paths (SPLIT-THEN-MERGE, MERGE-THEN-SPLIT, APPROACH-THEN-SWAP) between the incumbent and new best solutions, with OPEN/RESERVE/SUBSTITUTE lists and conflict resolution across agents.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use SALDAE instead of PICSCSG algorithms · nine distributions, including Uniform, Normal, Beta, Exponential, Gamma, Pascal, Zipf, and Cauchyoptimal-solution success rateHelped
Use SALDAE instead of CSG-UCTCSG algorithms · nine distributions, including Uniform, Normal, Beta, Exponential, Gamma, Pascal, Zipf, and Cauchyoptimal-solution success rateHelped
Use SPLIT-THEN-MERGE rather than MERGE-THEN-SPLIT bridging paths (ablation)SALDAE · Uniform, A-b Normal, A-b Uniform, Beta, Exponential, Gamma, and Zipfoptimal-solution success rate: 1580 (79%) vs 1402 (70.1%); 582 (29.1%) vs 503 (25.2%); 551 (27.5%) vs 532 (26.6%); 1485 (74.3%) vs 1392 (69.6%); 1826 (Helped
Use MERGE-THEN-SPLIT rather than SPLIT-THEN-MERGE bridging paths (ablation)SALDAE · Normal and Cauchyoptimal-solution success rate: 531 (26.6%) vs 519 (26%); 1722 (86.1%) vs 1714 (85.7%)Helped
Change the bridging strategy among SPLIT-THEN-MERGE, MERGE-THEN-SPLIT, and APPROACH-THEN-SWAP (ablation)SALDAE · Gamma and Zipfoptimal-solution success rate: Gamma: 1628 (81.4%), 1623 (81.2%), 1673 (83.7%); Zipf: 1286 (64.3%), 1263 (63.2%), 1287 (64.4%)Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic value distributions (Agent-based Uniform, Agent-based Normal, Beta, Exponential, Gamma, Normal, Uniform, Pasca Disaster Response distribution Electric Vehicles Allocation distribution

Benchmarks: nine value distributions for small-scale (4-20 agents) vs ODP-IP optimum large-scale gain rate on Disaster Response, Electric Vehicles Allocation and other distributions with hundreds to thousa

Metrics: solution quality success rate (optimal solutions found over 2000 executions) gain rate

Baselines: PICS CSG-UCT ODP-IP FACS C-Link

Builds on: Conflict-Based Search PICS CSG-UCT ODP-IP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy