atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

HYPRL: Reinforcement Learning of Control Policies for Hyperproperties

NeurIPS 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: In-context and adaptive RL · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HYPRL, which Skolemizes HyperLTL formulas and uses quantitative robustness-based reward shaping so off-the-shelf RL (DQN, PPO, CQ-learning) learns multi-agent policies that maximize satisfaction of quantifier-alternating hyperproperties.

Problem

Reward shaping for multi-agent RL tasks with inter-agent dependencies, where existing approaches implicitly treat specifications as universally quantified and miss optimal joint policies.

Approach

Skolemize HyperLTL formulas with quantifier alternation so existentially quantified agent traces become Skolem functions of universal traces, then define quantitative (robustness) semantics over zipped traces to produce per-step rewards for standard RL algorithms.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add HypRL to PPOPPO · DST, 500 and 1000 episodestotal treasures: 4.31$\pm1.2$ -> 22.93$\pm2.2$; 3.22$\pm0.8$ -> 23.97$\pm2.2$Helped
Add HypRL to DQNDQN · DST, 500 and 1000 episodestotal treasures: 1.08$\pm0.2$ -> 4.12$\pm1.4$; 1.45$\pm0.2$ -> 4.43$\pm0.8$Helped
Add HypRL to PPOPPO · Wildfire 3²Steps O2: 787.03$\pm31.8$ -> 143.550$\pm1.1$Helped
Add HypRL to PPOPPO · Wildfire 5² and 8²victim rescue within step bound: S/B -> 8057.5$\pm121.4$; S/B -> 386.2$\pm$80.5Helped
Add HypRL to PPOPPO · Wildfire 10²fire extinguishing within step bound: S/B -> 21272.8$\pm$3579.0Helped
Add HypRL to CQ-learningCQ-learning · SRL, 2 agents across ISR, Pentagon, SUNY, and MITsteps: ISR: 27.95$\pm7.4$ -> 7.58$\pm0.3$; Pentagon: 36.46$\pm7.7$ -> 11.90$\pm4.6$; SUNY: 11.99$\pm0.5$ -> 12.48$\pm0.6$; MIT:Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Safe RL grid-world maps (ISR, Pentagon, SUNY, MIT) Deep Sea Treasure Post Correspondence Problem instances Wildfire grid-worlds (3^2 to 10^2)

Benchmarks: Safe RL grid worlds (ISR, Pentagon, SUNY, MIT) Deep Sea Treasure Post Correspondence Problem Wildfire scenario

Metrics: steps to goal collisions treasures collected successful matches steps to rescue victims and extinguish fires distance between agents

Baselines: CQ-learning CQ-learning + shield synthesis DQN with manual reward PPO with manual reward

Builds on: HyperLTL DQN PPO CQ-learning SPECTRL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy