atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

PASS: Path-selective State Space Model for Event-based Recognition

NeurIPS 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Event-based video reconstruction · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes PASS, a state-space-model (VideoMamba-based) framework for event-camera recognition with a path-selective frame selection module (PEAS) and a multi-faceted selection guiding loss (MSG), targeting long event streams and generalization across inference frequencies.

Problem

Event-based object/action recognition methods handle only a narrow range of event lengths and generalize poorly when inference sampling frequency differs from training frequency.

Approach

Use a differentiable Gumbel-softmax frame selection (PEAS) to map variable-length event frame sequences to fixed-size selected frames, scanned bidirectionally by a Mamba-based SSM, plus an information-entropy/mutual-information loss (MSG) that reduces selection randomness and redundancy.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use PASS instead of ExACTEvent recognition · PAFTop-1 accuracy (%): +3.45%Helped
use PASS instead of ExACTEvent recognition · SeActTop-1 accuracy (%): +0.38%Helped
use PASS instead of ExACTEvent recognition · HARDVSTop-1 accuracy (%): +8.31%Helped
use PASS instead of EventDanceEvent recognition · N-Caltech101Top-1 accuracy (%): +2.25%Helped
use PASS instead of MEMEvent recognition · N-ImagenetTop-1 accuracy (%): +3.43%Helped
use PASS-M-K(32) instead of S5-ViT-B-K(32)ArDVS100 recognition · ArDVS100Top-1 accuracy (%): 97.35% vs. 93.39%Helped
use PASS-T-K(32) instead of S5-ViT-B-K(32)TemArDVS100 recognition · TemArDVS100Top-1 accuracy (%): 89.00% vs. 79.62%Helped
use PASS trained at 60 Hz, evaluated at 100 Hz, instead of the cited baselineInference-frequency generalization · PAFaccuracy drop (%): -8.62% vs. -20.69%Helped
use PEAS instead of random frame sampling (ablation)PASS-T · PAFTop-1 accuracy (%): 92.98% -> 93.33% (+0.35%)Helped
use PEAS instead of random frame sampling (ablation)PASS-T · ArDVS100Top-1 accuracy (%): 92.23% -> 92.84% (+0.61%)Helped
add MSG loss to PEAS (ablation)PASS-T · PAFTop-1 accuracy (%): 93.33% -> 94.83% (+1.85% over random-sampling baseline)Helped
add MSG loss to PEAS (ablation)PASS-T · ArDVS100Top-1 accuracy (%): 92.84% -> 93.85% (+1.62% over random-sampling baseline)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PAF SeAct HARDVS N-Caltech101 N-ImageNet ArDVS100 TemArDVS100 Real-ArDVS10

Benchmarks: N-Caltech101 N-ImageNet PAF SeAct HARDVS ArDVS100 TemArDVS100 Real-ArDVS10

Metrics: Top-1 accuracy Top-5 accuracy accuracy drop across inference frequencies

Baselines: S5-ViT-B-K ExACT EventDance MEM EST EV-ACT EventTransAct EvT TTPIONT DiST

Builds on: VideoMamba Mamba Gumbel softmax S5-ViT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy