atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

State Space Models for Event Cameras

CVPR 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Dataset condensation and flow estimation · 44 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces SSM-ViT, a hybrid of state-space layers (S4D/S5) and vision transformer blocks for event-camera object detection, using learnable timescales to generalize across inference frequencies and two anti-aliasing strategies (output bandlimiting and H2 norm).

Problem

Event-camera detectors trained on event representations at one temporal window size (frequency) degrade sharply when deployed at higher inference frequencies, and recurrent training is slow.

Approach

Replace RNN temporal aggregation with linear state-space layers whose learnable timescale can be rescaled at inference to match new frequencies, combined with frequency-selective output masking and an H2-norm loss to suppress aliasing.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace recurrent layers with SSM temporal aggregationEvent-camera object detection models · Gen1 and 1 Mpx, evaluation at higher frequenciesmAP performance drop: 3.31 mAP vs 21.25 and 24.53 mAPHelped
Use S5 instead of RVTEvent-camera object detection · Gen1 and 1 Mpx validation, 20–200 Hzperformance drop: RVT 27.62, 29.42, 16.00; S5 H2 norm 4.23, 4.72, 3.11Helped
Apply frequency-selective masking with α=0.5 (ablation)S4D and S5 · Gen1 valmAP: S4D-legS: 46.93 -> 47.33; S5-legS: 48.33 -> 48.48Mixed
Replace legS initialization with inv initialization (ablation)S4D and S5 · Gen1 valmAP at α=0.5: 47.33 -> 46.23; 48.48 -> 47.43Hurt
Replace legS initialization with lin initialization (ablation)S4D and S5 · Gen1 valmAP at α=0.5: 47.33 -> 46.02; 48.48 -> 46.40Hurt
Remove SSM recurrence from all stages (ablation)SSM-ViT · Gen1 valmAP: 33.90 vs 47.33Hurt
Add SSM recurrence beginning at stage 4 (ablation)SSM-ViT · Gen1 valmAP: 33.90 -> 39.99Helped
Add SSM recurrence in stages 1–4 rather than stages 1–3 (ablation)SSM-ViT · Gen1 valmAP: S4D: 47.02 -> 47.33; S5: 48.41 -> 48.48Mixed
Use H2 norm rather than α=0.5 masking (ablation)S4D and S5 · Gen1 and 1 Mpx validation, 20–200 Hzperformance drop: S4D Gen1: 5.31 vs 5.61; S4D 1Mpx: 4.66 vs 5.77; S5 Gen1: 4.23 vs 4.30; S5 1Mpx: 3.11 vs 2.82Mixed
Use SSM-based model instead of RNN/Transformer recurrent approachesEvent-camera object detection · Trainingtraining speed: 33% fasterHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Gen1 Automotive Detection 1 Mpx detection dataset DSEC

Benchmarks: Gen1 1 Mpx DSEC

Metrics: mAP runtime (ms) performance drop across frequencies

Baselines: RVT-B GET-T Swin-T v2 Nested-T ERGO-12 RED S4D-ViT-B

Builds on: S4 S4D S5 RVT YOLOX

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy