atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Cooperative multi-agent RL

Multi-agent Markov Entanglement

NeurIPS 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Cooperative multi-agent RL · approach: Value factorization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that multi-agent MDP value decomposition into a sum of local Q-functions is exact iff the joint transition matrix is separable (a Markov analogue of quantum entanglement), bounds decomposition error by a Markov entanglement measure, and shows index policies in RMAB have O(sqrt N) decomposition error.

Problem

Value decomposition of the global value function into a sum of local value functions is widely used in multi-agent RL and dynamic programming, but there is little theory on when and why it works for multi-agent Markov systems.

Approach

Defines Markov entanglement: a joint transition matrix is separable if it is a (linear, possibly negative-coefficient) combination of tensor products of local transition matrices. Exact Q-decomposition holds iff separable; a distance-to-separable-set measure bounds decomposition error under TV, agent-wise TV, and stationary-weighted norms. Applies mean-field analysis to show index policies in RMAB

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use a separable transition matrixTwo-agent MDP value decomposition · Exact Q-value decompositionQ-value decomposition error: 0Helped
Apply any index policy satisfying non-degeneracy and UGAPN-agent RMAB · RMABμ-weighted decomposition error: O(√N)Helped
Increase the number of agents under an index policyCirculant RMAB · Circulant RMABMarkov entanglement: O(1/√N)Helped
Increase the number of driversRide-hailing simulator · Ride-hailing simulatordecomposition error relative to global Q-values: O(1/√N); ≤3%Helped
Measure entanglement with agent-wise total variation instead of total variationTwo-agent MDP decomposition error bound · General two-agent MDPstightness of the entanglement boundHelped
Use μ-weighted agent-wise total variationMulti-agent MDP decomposition error bound · General multi-agent MDPsdecomposition error normMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYC yellow cab data

Benchmarks: circulant RMAB benchmark ride-hailing simulator

Metrics: Markov entanglement estimate mu-weighted decomposition error decomposition error relative to global Q-value

Builds on: Whittle index policy weakly-coupled MDP quantum entanglement separability temporal difference learning

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy