atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Towards Open Respiratory Acoustic Foundation Models: Pretraining and Benchmarking

NeurIPS 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Audio-visual speech separation · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces OPERA, an open respiratory acoustic foundation model pretraining and benchmarking system: curates ~404 hours of respiratory audio, pretrains three SSL encoders (contrastive transformer, contrastive CNN, generative transformer), and benchmarks them on 19 health tasks against general-audio models.

Problem

Respiratory audio foundation models are under-explored; existing acoustic models are pretrained on general audio with very little respiratory content, the one respiratory model (HeAR) is not open, and no standardized benchmark exists for respiratory audio health tasks.

Approach

Pretrain open respiratory-specific acoustic encoders on a curated multi-source respiratory audio corpus using contrastive (transformer and CNN) and masked generative (transformer) SSL, and evaluate all models with a unified linear-probe pipeline over 19 tasks built from 10 public or controlled-access datasets.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Pretrain on respiratory audio with contrastive learning using a transformer encoderOPERA-CT · Health condition inference tasksMRR: 0.4319 -> 0.6944Helped
Pretrain on respiratory audio with generative learning using a transformer encoderOPERA-GT · Lung function estimation tasksMRR: 0.1918 -> 0.6548Helped
Use contrastive rather than generative pretrainingOPERA respiratory encoders · Health condition inference tasksMRR: 0.6944 (OPERA-CT) vs 0.4569 (OPERA-GT)Mixed
Use generative rather than contrastive pretrainingOPERA respiratory encoders · Lung function estimation tasksMRR: 0.6548 (OPERA-GT) vs 0.3381 (OPERA-CT)Helped
Replace the transformer encoder with a lightweight CNN encoderOPERA-CE vs OPERA-CT · All 19 tasksMRR: 0.5632 -> 0.4412Hurt
Fine-tune instead of linear probing with 1749 labeled samplesOPERA models on T4 symptom cough · T4 symptom coughAUROC: 0.680 -> 0.710 (OPERA-CT); 0.673 -> 0.715 (OPERA-GT)Helped
Fine-tune instead of linear probing with 6648 labeled samplesOPERA-GT on T4 symptom cough · T4 symptom coughAUROC: 0.673 -> 0.735Helped
Fine-tune instead of linear probingOPERA-CT on T12 body position · T12 body positionAUROC: 0.781 -> 0.994Helped
Combine the contrastive and generative pretraining objectives (ablation)Hybrid OPERA model · Respiratory benchmark tasksperformanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: COVID-19 Sounds UK COVID-19 COUGHVID ICBHI HF Lung Coswara KAUH Respiratory@TR SSBPR MMLung NoseMic

Benchmarks: OPERA benchmark (19 respiratory health tasks)

Metrics: AUROC MAE MRR

Baselines: OpenSmile (Emobase) VGGish AudioMAE CLAP

Builds on: AudioMAE CLAP Masked autoencoders Hierarchical token-semantic audio transformer EfficientNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy