atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

Skinned Motion Retargeting with Dense Geometric Interaction Perception

NeurIPS 2024 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Scene-aware human motion synthesis · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MeshRet, a single-stage skinned motion retargeting framework that models dense geometric interactions via semantically consistent sensors and a dense mesh interaction field, trained on Mixamo and a new ScanRet dataset.

Problem

Skinned motion retargeting often produces interpenetration, jitter and contact mismatches because skeleton-level retargeting and geometry correction conflict; existing methods ignore body geometry or correct it in a separate stage.

Approach

Establish dense mesh correspondence across different topologies using semantically consistent sensors derived MAIT-style from skeleton bones, encode pairwise sensor interactions as a spatio-temporal DMI field, and align the source and target DMI fields during a single-pass transformer retargeting network.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use a mixture of proximal and distal sensor pairs instead of only proximal pairs (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 0.800 -> 0.772Helped
use a mixture of proximal and distal sensor pairs instead of only proximal pairs (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Penetration (%): 3.35 -> 3.45Hurt
add proximal sensor pairs instead of using only farthest pairs (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 1.642 -> 0.772Helped
add proximal sensor pairs instead of using only farthest pairs (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Penetration (%): 5.37 -> 3.45Helped
replace the DMI consistency loss with distance matrix loss (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 0.772 -> 2.568Hurt
replace the DMI consistency loss with distance matrix loss (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Penetration (%): 3.45 -> 4.69Hurt
use half the sample points in the SCS φ space (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Penetration (%): 3.45 -> 3.90Hurt
use half the sample points in the SCS l space (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 0.772 -> 0.805Hurt
use 75% proximal sensor pairs instead of the 50% mixture (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 0.772 -> 0.909Hurt
use 25% proximal sensor pairs instead of the 50% mixture (ablation)MeshRet · Mixamo+Contact Error: 0.772 -> 0.781No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Mixamo ScanRet

Benchmarks: ScanRet Mixamo+

Metrics: MSE local MSE contact error penetration ratio human preference

Baselines: Copy PMnet SAN R2ET Zhang et al. 2023 semantics

Builds on: PMnet MAIT PointNet FaceFormer alignment mask Zhang et al. 2023 skinned motion retargeting (R2ET)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy