atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Latent Intrinsics Emerge from Training to Relight

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Disentangled and discrete latent models · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains a purely data-driven autoencoder on paired same-scene images under different lighting so that latent intrinsics and extrinsics emerge, enabling relighting and zero-shot albedo recovery.

Problem

Image relighting of real scenes: inverse-graphics pipelines need explicit geometry/material choices and struggle with indoor interreflections, and supervised relighting needs lighting labels or depth.

Approach

Relighting is done entirely with latent variables: an encoder yields spatial latent intrinsics from the target image and pooled latent extrinsics from a reference image, combined via a constrained scaling bottleneck (small alpha) and decoded. Intrinsicness is enforced by a coding-rate regularized invariance loss across lightings, and setting alpha=0 yields albedo without any albedo training data.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed latent relighting method instead of unsupervised SA-AEMIT multi-illumination test · MIT multi-illumination testRMSE (raw): 0.443 -> 0.297Helped
Use the proposed latent relighting method instead of light-supervised SA-AEMIT multi-illumination test · MIT multi-illumination testRMSE (raw): 0.288 -> 0.297Hurt
Apply global color correction to the proposed model outputOurs · MIT multi-illumination testRMSE: 0.297 -> 0.222Helped
Disable denoising noise during training (σ=0) (ablation)Ours · MIT multi-illumination testSSIM (raw): 0.473 -> 0.232Hurt
Remove L_reg (ablation)Ours · MIT multi-illumination testSSIM (raw): 0.462 -> 0.473Hurt
Remove constrained scaling (α=∞) (ablation)Ours · MIT multi-illumination testRMSE (raw): 0.297 -> 0.471Hurt
Set α=1e-2 instead of α=5e-3 (ablation)Ours · MIT multi-illumination testRMSE (raw): 0.297 -> 0.314Hurt
Tune δ for WHDR evaluation (ablation)Ours albedo · IIW testWHDR: 28.97 -> 19.09Helped
Apply flattening postprocessing (ablation)Ours albedo with tuned δ · IIW testWHDR: 19.09 -> 15.81Helped
Use the proposed albedo estimate with flattening and tuned δ instead of Intrinsic Diffusion with flattening and tuned δIIW test · IIW testWHDR: 17.10 -> 15.81Helped
Set α=5e-3 instead of α=1e-2 for albedo estimation (ablation)Ours albedo · IIW testWHDR: 15.81 -> 16.02Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MIT multi-illumination dataset IIW StyLitGAN generated images

Benchmarks: MIT multi-illumination dataset (relighting) IIW (albedo WHDR)

Metrics: RMSE SSIM WHDR

Baselines: SA-AE (supervised light index) SA-AE (unsupervised) S3-Net Intrinsic Diffusion Inverse Rendering BBA

Builds on: SA-AE StyLitGAN Intrinsic Diffusion

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy