atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

VISA: Variational Inference with Sequential Sample-Average Approximations

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Variational inference theory and gradients · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes VISA, a forward-KL importance-weighted VI method that reuses fixed sample-average approximations within an ESS-based trust region, cutting model evaluations for expensive, possibly non-differentiable models.

Problem

Importance-weighted forward-KL variational inference needs fresh model evaluations at every gradient step, which is costly for computationally intensive, non-differentiable simulation-based models.

Approach

Adapt sample-average approximations to forward-KL importance-weighted VI: fix a sample set drawn from a proposal (the variational distribution at an earlier iterate), optimize the deterministic surrogate, and refresh samples only when the effective sample size of the weights between current and proposal falls below a threshold (a trust region).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
reuse samples with sequential sample-average approximations instead of refreshing them at every gradient stepVISA vs. IWFVI · High-dimensional Gaussiansconvergence rateHelped
use a learning rate of 0.05VISA · High-dimensional Gaussiansreliable convergenceHurt
use lower ESS thresholdsVISA · High-dimensional Gaussiansconvergence rateHelped
use lower ESS thresholds, keeping samples fixed longerVISA · High-dimensional Gaussiansposterior variance approximationHurt
reuse samples with sequential sample-average approximations instead of refreshing them at every gradient stepVISA vs. IWFVI · Lotka-Volterramodel evaluations to convergenceHelped
use a learning rate of 0.01VISA · Lotka-Volterramodel evaluations to convergenceMixed
use a higher ESS thresholdVISA · Lotka-Volterratest lossHelped
reuse samples with sequential sample-average approximationsVISA vs. IWFVI · Pickover attractorconvergence stabilityHelped
optimize the forward-KL SAA with L-BFGS and line search (ablation)VISA · Forward-KL variational inferenceoptimization stabilityHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic high-dimensional Gaussians simulated Lotka-Volterra observations simulated Pickover attractor observations

Benchmarks: Gaussian targets (D=128 diagonal, D=32 dense) Lotka-Volterra inference Pickover attractor inference

Metrics: symmetric KL divergence forward KL divergence evidence upper bound / test loss number of model evaluations

Baselines: IWFVI BBVI-SF BBVI-RP reweighted wake-sleep

Builds on: importance-weighted forward-KL VI reweighted wake-sleep reparameterized black-box VI with SAA batched L-BFGS pathfinder

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy