atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Molecule Design by Latent Prompt Transformer

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Structure-based 3D molecule generation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes the Latent Prompt Transformer (LPT), a latent-variable model whose causal Transformer is prompted by a Unet-transformed Gaussian latent that also predicts the property, and optimizes molecules by gradual distribution shifting (SGDS) with software-in-the-loop scoring.

Problem

Molecule design as conditional generation/optimization of molecules with optimal values of a target chemical or biological property (binding affinity, QED, SA) computed by software, under limited queries and out-of-distribution property values.

Approach

A latent vector with a learnable Unet prior serves as a soft prompt for a causal Transformer string generator and also feeds an MLP property regressor; the model is trained by approximate maximum likelihood using short Langevin posterior sampling and then shifted toward higher property values via SGDS, replacing LSTM and latent EBM priors of LEBM.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSESR1 single-objective molecule design · ESR1K_D (nmol/L), best three reported: 0.03 -> 0.004; 0.03 -> 0.005; 0.04 -> 0.014Helped
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSACAA1 single-objective molecule design · ACAA1K_D (nmol/L), best three reported: 0.11 -> 0.037; 0.11 -> 0.046; 0.12 -> 0.084Helped
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSESR1 multi-objective molecule design · ESR1K_D (nmol/L): 0.36 -> 0.04; 1.28 -> 0.05Helped
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSESR1 multi-objective molecule design · ESR1QED: 0.44 -> 0.58; 0.44 -> 0.46Mixed
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSESR1 multi-objective molecule design · ESR1SA: 3.99 -> 3.46; 3.86 -> 3.24Helped
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSACAA1 multi-objective molecule design · ACAA1K_D (nmol/L): 4.55 -> 0.18; 5.67 -> 0.21Helped
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSACAA1 multi-objective molecule design · ACAA1QED: 0.56 -> 0.50; 0.60 -> 0.61Mixed
Use LPT-SGDS instead of LEBM-SGDSACAA1 multi-objective molecule design · ACAA1SA: 4.07 -> 4.85; 4.58 -> 4.18Mixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ZINC

Benchmarks: ESR1 binding affinity optimization ACAA1 binding affinity optimization multi-objective ESR1/ACAA1 with QED and SA

Metrics: top-3 lowest K_D (nM) top-2 average K_D, QED, SA

Baselines: GCPN MolDQN MARS GraphDF LIMO LEBM-SGDS

Builds on: LEBM-SGDS SGDS Langevin dynamics SELFIES

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy