atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Bayesian optimization

Multi-Objective Molecular Design Through Learning Latent Pareto Set

AAAI 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Bayesian optimization · approach: Multi-objective Bayesian optimization · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MLPS, which learns a global preference-to-Pareto-set neural network over a latent molecular space combined with local GP-based trust-region Bayesian optimization, for multi-objective molecular design.

Problem

Multi-objective molecular design requires approximating the full Pareto set of expensive, conflicting molecular objectives in a high-dimensional discrete chemical space, while existing methods return only a limited set of trade-off molecules.

Approach

Learn a global neural network mapping user preference vectors to Pareto-optimal latent molecular embeddings, trained with surrogate losses from local GP surrogates in multiple trust regions (centers chosen by hypervolume contribution), so global and local search share information.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MLPS rather than MARSMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SAHV: 0.916 -> 0.922Helped
Use MLPS rather than RetMolMulti-objective molecular design · GSK3β+JNK3HV: 0.910 -> 0.902Hurt
Use MLPS rather than RetMolMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+GSK3βHV: 0.771 -> 0.781Helped
Use MLPS rather than RetMolMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+JNK3HV: 0.781 -> 0.788Helped
Use MLPS rather than RetMolMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+GSK3β+JNK3HV: 0.701 -> 0.714Helped
Use MLPS rather than HN-GFNMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SAPM: 0.782 -> 0.789Helped
Use MLPS rather than HN-GFNMulti-objective molecular design · GSK3β+JNK3PM: 0.712 -> 0.734Helped
Use MLPS rather than MARSMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+GSK3βPM: 0.680 -> 0.737Helped
Use MLPS rather than MARSMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+JNK3PM: 0.674 -> 0.722Helped
Use MLPS rather than MolSearchMulti-objective molecular design · QED+SA+GSK3β+JNK3PM: 0.664 -> 0.669Helped
Add local models to MLPS (ablation)MLPS · QED+SA+GSK3β+JNK3HVHelped
Add the global Pareto set learning model to MLPS (ablation)MLPS · QED+SA+GSK3β+JNK3HVHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: 5000 antimicrobial peptides (antifungal case study)

Benchmarks: QED+SA GSK3β+JNK3 QED+SA+GSK3β QED+SA+JNK3 QED+SA+GSK3β+JNK3 antifungal peptide activity and toxicity

Metrics: hypervolume success rate novelty diversity product metric

Baselines: GA+D JT-VAE GCPN RationaleRL MARS MolSearch PSL RetMol HN-GFN

Builds on: Turbo PSL P-MOCO SELFIES

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy