atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Model-Based Transfer Learning for Contextual Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Probabilistic and autonomous RL · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Model-Based Transfer Learning (MBTL), a Bayesian-optimization method that sequentially selects a small set of source tasks to train RL policies for zero-shot transfer across a contextual MDP, with sublinear regret guarantees.

Problem

Brittle RL training across context variations in contextual MDPs; independent training is compute-expensive and multi-task training suffers from capacity and negative transfer, so the question is which intermediate set of source tasks to train.

Approach

Model generalization explicitly: a Gaussian process models source-task training performance (set point) and a linear function of context distance models the generalization gap; a UCB-style acquisition function minus the expected gap and best-so-far performance selects the next source task, with search-space elimination giving tighter regret bounds.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MBTL source-task selection instead of independent or multi-task trainingContextual RL training · Traffic and continuous control CMDPssample efficiency: up to 43xHelped
Use MBTL rather than independent or multi-task trainingTraffic CMDPs · Traffic CMDPsnormalized performanceHelped
Use MBTL rather than heuristic multi-policy task selectionContextual RL training · Traffic and continuous control CMDPsnormalized performanceMixed
Use MBTL rather than Sequential OracleTraffic CMDPs · Traffic CMDPs (K=15), averagenormalized performance: 0.7854 -> 0.7667Hurt
Use MBTL rather than Sequential OracleContinuous control CMDPs · Continuous control CMDPs (K=15), averagenormalized performance: 0.9304 -> 0.8998Hurt
Change the acquisition function optimism representation (EI versus UCB) (ablation)MBTL · Contextual RL benchmarksperformanceNo clear effect
Change the underlying single-task RL algorithm (ablation)MBTL · Contextual RL benchmarksperformanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CARL benchmark (Cartpole, Pendulum, BipedalWalker, HalfCheetah) SUMO traffic simulation (traffic signal control, eco-driving, advisory autonomy)

Benchmarks: CARL continuous control CMDPs SUMO traffic CMDPs (traffic signal, eco-driving, advisory autonomy)

Metrics: normalized average return across target tasks sample efficiency (N/k*)

Baselines: Independent training Multi-task RL Random selection Greedy strategy Sequential Oracle transfer

Builds on: GP-UCB contextual MDP CARL benchmark

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy