atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning

Federated Natural Policy Gradient and Actor Critic Methods for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning

NeurIPS 2024 · Reinforcement learning › MDPs and planning · approach: Policy optimization theory · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes federated natural policy gradient (FedNPG) and federated natural actor-critic (FedNAC) methods for fully decentralized multi-task RL, using gossip mixing of log-policies and gradient tracking of the global Q-function, with non-asymptotic convergence guarantees nearly dimension-free in state-action space size.

Problem

Learning a single globally optimal softmax policy across agents with private per-task rewards and a shared transition kernel, where agents only communicate with graph neighbors and no reward sharing is allowed; prior work lacks non-asymptotic guarantees for decentralized multi-task policy optimizati

Approach

Federated NPG under softmax parameterization mixes neighbors' log-policies via a gossip matrix while tracking the global Q-function with dynamic average consensus (Q-tracking), giving multiplicative policy updates; the entropy-regularized variant yields linear convergence, and a federated actor-critic variant extends this to function approximation with on-policy samples.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add entropy regularization to FedNPGFedNPG for multi-task RL · Regularized versus unregularized multi-task RLconvergence rateHelped
Use a fully connected communication network ($\sigma=0$)FedNPG · Unregularized multi-task RLiteration complexity: $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$Helped
Use a fully connected communication network ($\sigma=0$)FedNPG with entropy regularization · Regularized multi-task RLiteration complexity: $\mathcal{O}\Big( \frac{1}{\eta\tau}\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\Big)$Helped
Allow inexact local policy evaluation, with sufficiently small approximation errorsFedNPG · Unregularized multi-task RLconvergence rateNo clear effect
Use on-policy sampling and function approximation in place of exact tabular policy evaluationFedNAC · Function-approximation multi-task RLsample complexity per agent: $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{(1-\gamma)^8\varepsilon^3}\right)$; $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{(1-\gamma)^{45/4}\varepsilon^{Mixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: sub-optimality gap iteration complexity sample complexity consensus error

Baselines: NPG Q-NPG

Builds on: natural policy gradient Q-NPG dynamic average consensus gradient tracking

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy