atlas

Research map / Time series / Long-term forecasting

Rethinking Fourier Transform from A Basis Functions Perspective for Long-term Time Series Forecasting

NeurIPS 2024 · Time series › Long-term forecasting · approach: Transformers for long-term forecasting · 10 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Fourier Basis Mapping (FBM), which embeds the DFT as cosine/sine basis expansion to create time-frequency features that plug into linear, MLP, and PatchTST-style networks for long-term time series forecasting.

Problem

Existing Fourier-based LTSF methods treat real and imaginary frequency components as plain coefficients in frequency space, which causes inconsistent starting cycles and inconsistent series length issues, so frequency meanings are ambiguous and time-frequency relations are missed.

Approach

Reinterpret DFT real and imaginary parts as cosine and sine basis coefficients, then multiply them with orthogonal cosine and sine basis matrices to form time-frequency features that keep temporal structure; a simple mapping network (linear, 3-layer MLP, or PatchTST-like) then maps these features to the forecast.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add Fourier basis expansion to a vanilla linear networkNLinear · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizons (Average)MSE: 0.333 -> 0.323Helped
Add Fourier basis expansion to a vanilla linear networkNLinear · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizons (Average)MAE: 0.349 -> 0.339Helped
Add Fourier basis expansion before patchingPatchTST · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizonsMSEHelped
Use Fourier basis expansion with a three-layer MLP mappingTimeMixer · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizonsMSEHelped
Replace the linear mapping with a three-layer nonlinear MLP mapping (ablation)FBM · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizonsMSE: 0.323 vs 0.325Mixed
Replace the linear mapping with a PatchTST-style nonlinear mapping (ablation)FBM · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizonsMSE: 0.323 vs 0.321Mixed
Use a PatchTST-style mapping instead of a three-layer MLP mapping (ablation)FBM · Eight LTSF datasets, four horizonsMSE: 0.325 vs 0.321No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ETTh1 ETTh2 ETTm1 ETTm2 Electricity Traffic Weather Exchange PEMS03 PEMS04 PEMS07 PEMS08

Benchmarks: ETTh1 ETTh2 ETTm1 ETTm2 Electricity Traffic Weather Exchange PEMS03 PEMS04 PEMS07 PEMS08

Metrics: MSE MAE MAPE

Baselines: NLinear PatchTST iTransformer TimeMixer N-BEATS CrossGNN FEDformer FreTS FITS FiLM BasisFormer TimesNet

Builds on: NLinear PatchTST N-BEATS FreTS FITS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy