atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Multimodal LLMs

Non-Natural Image Understanding with Advancing Frequency-based Vision Encoders

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Multimodal LLMs · approach: Benchmarks and analysis of MLLMs · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FM-ViT, a CLIP ViT with learnable Fourier-based frequency modulation of self-attention outputs (sample-adaptive via wavelet features), and EDGE, an MLLM combining FM-ViT with a CNN encoder, for non-natural image understanding (geometry, charts, functions).

Problem

Multimodal LLMs underperform on non-natural images (geometric figures, charts, function plots) because ViT vision encoders attenuate high-frequency information needed for points, lines, and angles, and non-natural image datasets are costly to collect.

Approach

Decompose ViT self-attention outputs into DC and high-frequency components via Fourier decomposition and re-weight them with learnable coefficients that are modulated per sample by wavelet-transform statistics of the input image; combine with a CNN encoder and a three-stage training pipeline to build EDGE.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add frequency modulation to the vision encoder (ablation)CLIP ViT-L/14 · Overall (3 types of data)Classify: 68.3 -> 73.1Helped
Add frequency modulation to the vision encoder (ablation)CLIP ViT-L/14 · Overall (3 types of data)Txt2Img: 84.3 -> 86.6Helped
Add frequency modulation to the vision encoder (ablation)CLIP ViT-L/14 · Overall (3 types of data)Img2Txt: 84.4 -> 86.9Helped
Add sample-wise adaptation (ablation)FM-ViT · Overall (3 types of data)Classify: 71.9 -> 73.1Helped
Add sample-wise adaptation (ablation)FM-ViT · Overall (3 types of data)Txt2Img: 85.8 -> 86.6Helped
Add sample-wise adaptation (ablation)FM-ViT · Overall (3 types of data)Img2Txt: 86.1 -> 86.9Helped
Use EDGE with FM-ViT instead of the strongest listed baselineVicuna-1.5-7B MLLM · GeoQAaccuracy: 67.1 -> 68.2Helped
Use EDGE with FM-ViT instead of the strongest listed open-source baselineFunctionQA · FunctionQAaccuracy: 40.3 -> 43.5Helped
Use EDGE with FM-ViT instead of ChartLLaMAChartQA · ChartQAaccuracy: 69.6 -> 72.5Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Geo170K MAVIS-Caption MAVIS-Instruct ChartLlama data GeoQA MathVista FunctionQA ChartQA

Benchmarks: GeoQA MathVista FunctionQA ChartQA Geo caption Chart caption Function caption

Metrics: accuracy classification accuracy retrieval accuracy caption correctness and detail scores

Baselines: LLaVA-1.5 LLaMA-Adapter LLaVA-NeXT G-LLaVA MAVIS EAGLE Math-LLaVA ChartLlama Unichart GPT-4V Gemini-1.0-Pro Qwen-VL-Max

Builds on: CLIP LLaVA-1.5 G-LLaVA MAVIS ChartLlama

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy