AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Games and equilibria

Robust Multi-agent Counterfactual Prediction

NeurIPS 2019 · Multi-agent systems and games › Games and equilibria · approach: Learning with strategic agents · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
allow small positive ε-equilibrium regretRMAC auction revenue predictions · 2-player auctionsrevenue boundsMixed
use RMAC bounds instead of a point estimate when types are not identifiedRMAC · Second-price auction with reserve .5counterfactual revenue boundsMixed
change the mechanism from Boston to RSDRMAC · School choicetruthfulnessMixed
change the mechanism from Boston to RSDRMAC · School choicesocial welfareMixed
change the mechanism from RSD to BostonRMAC · School choice with identical student preferencestruthfulnessHurt
change the mechanism from RSD to BostonRMAC · School choice with identical student preferencessocial welfareNo clear effect
use the mean mechanism, where a range of types can report extreme actions in equilibriumRMAC · Social choicetype identificationHurt
use a small nonzero ε in the mean mechanismRMAC · Social choicesolution uniquenessHelped
use the median mechanism rather than VCGRMAC · Social choicerobustness to reporting deviationsMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy