AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Multitask Boosting for Survival Analysis with Competing Risks

NeurIPS 2018 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Survival analysis under censoring · 13 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
train all causes jointly (Gray's test split) instead of separately per cause (ablation)SMTBoost · SEER CVDC-index: 0.721 -> 0.766Helped
train all causes jointly instead of separately (ablation)SMTBoost · SEER Breast CancerC-index: 0.795 -> 0.819Helped
train all causes jointly instead of separately (ablation)SMTBoost · SEER OtherC-index: 0.660 -> 0.688Helped
train all causes jointly instead of separately (ablation)SMTBoost · Synthetic T1C-index: 0.631 -> 0.664Helped
boosting to handle task imbalance (SMTBoost vs RSF)tree ensembles for competing risks · SEER CVD (1.7% of events)C-index: 0.722 -> 0.766Helped
re-balance by oversampling low-incidence instances (Weighted RSF vs RSF)RSF · SEER and syntheticC-index: 0.722 -> 0.730 (CVD); 0.789 -> 0.778 (Breast)Mixed
SMTBoost versus linear proportional-hazards models on linear-effect taskSMTBoost · Synthetic T2C-index: 0.705 -> 0.721No clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy