atlas

Research map / 3D vision / NeRF and radiance fields

Aleth-NeRF: Illumination Adaptive NeRF with Concealing Field Assumption

AAAI 2024 · 3D vision › NeRF and radiance fields · approach: Few-shot neural rendering architectures · 53 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Aleth-NeRF, which adds learnable "concealing field" transmittance terms to NeRF and uses unsupervised lightness losses to render normal-light novel views from low-light or over-exposed multi-view images, plus a new LOM dataset.

Problem

Standard NeRF assumes normal-light capture; under low-light or over-exposed inputs, it entangles illumination and material and fails to recover normal-light novel views.

Approach

Model extra light attenuation in the air via a local concealing field (conv over density MLP output) and a global learnable concealing field multiplied into accumulated transmittance; train on adverse-light images with unsupervised degree, contrast, and color constancy losses so rendering without (low-light) or with (over-exposure) the concealing field yields normal-light views.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM low-light meanPSNR: 6.84 -> 19.87Helped
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM low-light meanSSIM: 0.150 -> 0.754Helped
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM low-light meanLPIPS: 0.582 -> 0.417Helped
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM over-exposure meanPSNR: 9.60 -> 18.09Helped
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM over-exposure meanSSIM: 0.660 -> 0.745Helped
Use Aleth-NeRF with concealing fields instead of vanilla NeRFNeRF · LOM over-exposure meanLPIPS: 0.457 -> 0.488Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LOM (self-collected low-light, normal-light, over-exposure multi-view dataset)

Benchmarks: LOM

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: NeRF RetiNexNet Zero-DCE SCI LLVE MBLLEN RAW-NeRF HE IAT MSEC

Builds on: NeRF Instant-NGP inverse tone curve

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy