atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Heterogeneous Sufficient Dimension Reduction and Subspace Clustering

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Subspace clustering

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes mixPFC, a mixture of principal fitted components model that jointly performs supervised subspace clustering, subspace estimation and variable selection via a group-Lasso penalized EM algorithm with non-asymptotic convergence guarantees.

Problem

Sufficient dimension reduction assumes a homogeneous population, and subspace clustering ignores the response and needs separation conditions; there is no method that jointly clusters heterogeneous data and estimates regression-relevant subspaces in high dimensions.

Approach

Combine model-based SDR (principal fitted components) with a latent-cluster mixture so each cluster has its own central subspace; estimate subspaces by a convex group-Lasso problem over a roughly p-dimensional parameter, avoiding p x p inversions, within an EM algorithm.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use mixPFC instead of LassoCCLE drug-response prediction · Nutlin-3PMSE ×100: 17.6 (0.3) -> 8.9(0.4)Helped
Use mixPFC instead of LassoCCLE drug-response prediction · AZD6244PMSE ×100: 77.6 (1.5) -> 45.6 (1.7)Helped
Use mixPFC instead of K-means on X ◦ YmixPFC · M1, K=2, Δ=0.1Ipclustering error rate: 20.2 (0.3) -> 3.4 (0.7)Helped
Use mixPFC instead of LSAmixPFC · M2, K=2, Δ=0.1Ipclustering error rate: 4.9 (0.1) -> 16.4 (2.0)Hurt
Use mixPFC instead of K-means on X ◦ YmixPFC · M3, K=2, Δ=0.1Ipclustering error rate: 22.3 (0.3) -> 3.6 (1.2)Helped
Use mixPFC instead of SSCmixPFC · M4, K=3, Δ=0.1Ipclustering error rate: 6.5 (0.1) -> 0 (0)Helped
Use mixPFC instead of SSCmixPFC · M4, K=5, Δ=0.1Ipclustering error rate: 13.8 (0.2) -> 0.2 (0.2)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AIS dataset CCLE dataset synthetic data from mixPFC model

Benchmarks: AIS dataset CCLE dataset

Metrics: clustering error rate prediction mean squared error number of selected variables

Baselines: RANSAC SSC LSA LRSC GPCA K-means hierarchical clustering LassoSIR SEAS-SIR SEAS-PFC Lasso

Builds on: principal fitted components probabilistic PCA SEAS-PFC LassoSIR mixture of linear regression

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy