Research map / Reinforcement learning / MDPs and planning
Transfer Q-Learning with Composite MDP Structures
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes a composite MDP model whose transition core is low-rank plus sparse, and UCB-TQL, a transfer Q-learning algorithm with regret bounds that are dimension-independent when the source task has many more trajectories.
Problem
Transfer RL with high-dimensional transition dynamics where tasks share a low-rank core but differ in sparse task-specific components; existing theory covers only pure low-rank or linear MDPs and value/reward similarity.
Approach
Model transition core as L* + S* (shared low-rank incoherent plus sparse), estimate the shared part from source data, then correct only a sparse difference D on target data, and build a tighter UCB confidence region restricting the sparsity of D, giving regret that scales with sqrt(e) and not the ambient dimension.
Key results
- UCB-TQL achieves regret e O(sqrt(e) H^5 N) when the source has N0 ≍ N^2 trajectories, independent of ambient dimension d.
- Single-task UCB-Q-learning under composite MDPs achieves regret of order sqrt(N H^5) with respect to N and d, matching prior results up to ambient-dimension and sparsity factors.
- Phase transition: when N0 ≥ N(rC_phi^2 + s), the regret is dominated by the sparse-difference correction term.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer from a source task with a shared low-rank component and sparse task-specific differences | UCB-TQL · Target task, composite MDP transfer | cumulative regret: eO(√eH5N) | Helped |
Limitations
- Theory only, no empirical experiments reported
- Requires incoherence and sparsity assumptions on the low-rank and sparse components
- Assumes known reward function and known sparsity level s0 for the source estimator
Experimental setup
Metrics: cumulative regret
Baselines: Yang & Wang (2020) UCB-Q-learning single-task RL
Builds on: UCB-Q-learning linear mixture MDP (Yang & Wang, 2019) linear factored MDP (Ayoub et al., 2020) REFUEL Chai & Fan (2024) separation lemma
Closest papers by meaning
- The Limits of Transfer Reinforcement Learning with Latent Low-rank Structure (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.89)
- When is Transfer Learning Possible? (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Model-Based Transfer Learning for Contextual Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- Fine-Grained Causal Dynamics Learning with Quantization for Improving Robustness in Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.86)
- Composite Flow Matching for Reinforcement Learning with Shifted-Dynamics Data (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- Shift Before You Learn: Enabling Low-Rank Representations in Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
