atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Fine-Grained Causal Dynamics Learning with Quantization for Improving Robustness in Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Causal discovery · approach: Causal representation identifiability · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FCDL, a causal dynamics model that jointly learns a VQ codebook quantizing the state-action space into subgroups, with a local causal graph per subgroup, improving robustness of model-based RL to locally spurious correlations and unseen states.

Problem

Existing causal dynamics models infer only a global causal graph and miss context-dependent (fine-grained) causal relationships, while sample-specific approaches lack interpretable contexts; this hurts robustness in RL to unseen states and locally spurious correlations.

Approach

Quantize the state-action space with a discrete latent codebook (vector quantization) so each code pairs a subgroup (context) with a local causal graph (adjacency matrix), learned end-to-end with the dynamics model under sparsity regularization, with identifiability guarantees for local causal graphs and contexts.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use subgroup quantization to infer context-specific local causal graphs instead of sample-specific dependency inferenceFCDL versus NCD · Chemical full-fork and full-chain downstream tasksaverage episode reward: 10.95 -> 15.27; 9.11 -> 14.73; 10.32 -> 13.62; 9.60 -> 13.36; 8.86 -> 12.35; 10.32 -> 12.00Helped
Use subgroup quantization to infer context-specific local causal graphs instead of sample-specific dependency inferenceFCDL versus NCD · Magnetic Testaverage episode reward: 1.31 -> 4.81Helped
Use subgroup quantization to infer context-specific local causal graphs instead of sample-specific dependency inferenceFCDL versus NCD · Chemical downstream tasks with noisy nodesprediction accuracy: 41.60 -> 66.44; 37.47 -> 58.49; 42.27 -> 49.09; 40.04 -> 60.34; 37.47 -> 56.64; 41.19 -> 53.29Helped
Set quantization degree K=2 rather than other tested quantization degrees (ablation)FCDL · Chemical full-fork downstream tasksaverage episode rewardHurt
Use quantization degrees other than K=2 (ablation)FCDL · Chemical full-fork downstream tasksaverage episode rewardHelped
Set quantization degree K=1, yielding one global causal graph (ablation)FCDL · Magnetic non-magnetic samplesstructural Hamming distance: mean SHD score of 6Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Chemical Magnetic

Benchmarks: Chemical (full-fork) Chemical (full-chain) Magnetic

Metrics: average episode reward prediction accuracy structural hamming distance

Baselines: MLP Modular GNN NPS CDL GRADER Oracle NCD

Builds on: CDL NCD vector quantization (VQ-VAE) context-set specific independence Gumbel-Softmax

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy