atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Robust Consensus Anchor Learning for Efficient Multi-view Subspace Clustering

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Subspace clustering · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RCSC, an anchor-based multi-view subspace clustering method that jointly learns robust consensus anchors, anchor graph, and cluster indicators under Frobenius-norm, non-negative and affine constraints, with a block-diagonal theoretical analysis.

Problem

Multi-view subspace clustering on large-scale data is computationally expensive for graph methods; existing anchor-based methods do not guarantee robustness of learned consensus anchors nor jointly learn anchors and the shared cluster structure.

Approach

Learn a shared set of consensus anchors with view-specific orthogonal projections, impose Frobenius-norm, non-negative and affine constraints on the anchor-graph coefficients, and jointly optimize anchors, graph, and a discrete cluster indicator via orthogonal nonnegative factorization, with a theorem giving block-diagonal structure under independent subspaces.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · ORLACC (%): 63.80±0.00 -> 65.20±0.00Helped
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · MfeatACC (%): 84.00±0.05 -> 85.60±0.00Helped
Use RCSC instead of FPMVSMulti-view clustering · Caltech101-20ACC (%): 66.15±0.10 -> 67.40±0.00Helped
Use RCSC instead of FPMVSMulti-view clustering · Caltech101-allACC (%): 27.50±0.05 -> 28.00±0.50Helped
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · SUNRGBDACC (%): 25.20±0.00 -> 27.00±0.00Helped
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · NUSWIDEOBJACC (%): 21.00±0.05 -> 23.50±0.00Helped
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · AWAACC (%): 9.00±0.10 -> 10.50±0.10Helped
Use RCSC instead of OMSCMulti-view clustering · YoutubeFaceACC (%): 26.50±0.00 -> 27.80±0.00Helped
Vary λ across the tested range (ablation)RCSC · Eight multi-view datasetsClustering performance (ACC, NMI, F1-score)No clear effect
Vary β across the tested range (ablation)RCSC · Eight multi-view datasetsClustering performance (ACC, NMI, F1-score)No clear effect
Vary the number of anchors from 2k to 7k (ablation)RCSC · Eight multi-view datasetsClustering performance (ACC, NMI, F1-score)No clear effect

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ORL Mfeat Caltech101-20 Caltech101-all SUNRGBD NUSWIDEOBJ AWA YoutubeFace

Benchmarks: ORL Mfeat Caltech101-20 Caltech101-all SUNRGBD NUSWIDEOBJ AWA YoutubeFace

Metrics: ACC NMI F1-score running time

Baselines: AMGL SFMC BMVC LMVSC MSGL FPMVS EOMSC-CA OMSC

Builds on: anchor graph multi-view clustering LMVSC MSGL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy