atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learning

ICML 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Learned state and action representations · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Gives a practitioner-oriented guide to empirical design in RL, proposing tolerance intervals, idealized-performance estimation, and controlled randomness, supported by DQN/SAC/DDPG case-study experiments on small classic-control environments.

Problem

Empirical RL results are often unreliable: untuned baselines, short episode cutoffs, skewed/bimodal performance distributions, and confidence intervals that miss the mean make conclusions about algorithm utility misleading.

Approach

Combines statistical tools (tolerance intervals, paired testing with controlled seeds, idealized-performance estimation that avoids maximization bias) with a framework treating hyperparameters as unknowns and a cross-validation-like view of hyperparameter optimization across environment sets, illustrated on simple RL testbeds.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use short episode cutoffs instead of longer cutoffsRL agents in the studied environments · Studied environmentsalgorithm performanceHelped
Add momentum to TDTD on Baird's counterexample · Baird's counterexampleconvergenceNo clear effect
Sweep stepsizes, target network refresh rates, and replay buffer sizes for every experimentDQN hyperparameter selection · Mountain Carexperiments over-reporting average performance for the best tested hyperparamete: 96%Hurt
Tune the default hyperparametersDQN · Lunar LanderperformanceHelped
Use common confidence interval approaches to estimate the meanDQN · PuddleWorldmean performance coverageHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Mountain Car PuddleWorld Lunar Lander Baird's counterexample Maze gridworld

Benchmarks: Mountain Car PuddleWorld Lunar Lander Baird's counterexample Maze gridworld

Metrics: average return tolerance intervals bootstrap confidence intervals

Baselines: DQN Soft Actor-Critic DDPG

Builds on: Expected SARSA DQN Soft Actor-Critic DDPG

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy