atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Offline RL

Efficient Policy Evaluation with Offline Data Informed Behavior Policy Design

ICML 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Offline RL · approach: Diffusion models for offline decision making · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Derives a closed-form variance-minimizing behavior policy for unbiased Monte Carlo policy evaluation and learns it from offline data via fitted Q-evaluation on a transformed reward, reducing online samples in Gridworld, online stochastic matching, and MuJoCo.

Problem

Online Monte Carlo policy evaluation requires many costly environment interactions; the goal is to reduce estimator variance while remaining unbiased by designing the behavior policy used for data collection.

Approach

Expands the behavior-policy space beyond coverage to a policy space where mu_t(a|s) is proportional to pi_t(a|s) times the square root of an auxiliary second-moment value function; the one-step variant is learned from offline data by applying fitted Q-evaluation twice (first on the original reward, then on a transformed reward 2rq - r^2), avoiding transition model estimation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ODI behavior-policy design instead of on-policy Monte CarloOnline stochastic matching · Single- and multi-capacity settingsrelative variance: 42%--49%Helped
Use ODI instead of on-policy MC, BPG, or ROSGridworld 27,000 · Match estimation accuracy at 300, 600, and 1200 baseline stepssteps: 300 -> 150; 600 -> 330; 1200 -> 540Helped
Increase ODI offline sample-to-support ratio from 23.15% to 46.3% (ablation)ODI on Gridworld 27,000 · Match estimation accuracy at 300, 600, and 1200 baseline stepssteps: 150 -> 90; 330 -> 180; 540 -> 420Helped
Use ODI instead of on-policy MCMuJoCo policy evaluation · Ant, Hopper, I. D. Pendulum, I. Pendulum, and Walkerepisodes: 100 -> 81; 100 -> 54; 100 -> 72; 100 -> 35; 100 -> 70Helped
Use ODI instead of BPGMuJoCo policy evaluation · Ant, Hopper, I. D. Pendulum, I. Pendulum, and Walkerepisodes: 91 -> 81; 89 -> 54; 103 -> 72; 95 -> 35; 92 -> 70Helped
Use ODI instead of ROSMuJoCo policy evaluation · Ant, Hopper, I. D. Pendulum, I. Pendulum, and Walkerepisodes: 103 -> 81; 100 -> 54; 99 -> 72; 90 -> 35; 91 -> 70Mixed

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Gridworld offline data (random actions, uniform state distribution)

Benchmarks: Gridworld Online Stochastic Matching MuJoCo (Ant, Hopper, Inverted Double Pendulum, Inverted Pendulum, Walker)

Metrics: normalized estimation error sample savings (steps or episodes to match on-policy MC) relative variance

Baselines: on-policy Monte Carlo BPG ROS

Builds on: per-decision importance sampling fitted Q evaluation behavior policy gradient (BPG) robust on-policy sampling (ROS)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy